142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38036991)
1. A transfer learning nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and benign conditions on MRI.
Chen J; Feng B; Hu M; Huang F; Chen Y; Ma X; Long W
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):200. PubMed ID: 38036991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.
Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model.
Li D; Zhang L; Xu Y; Wu X; Hua S; Jiang Y; Huang Q; Gao Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Oct; 149(13):11309-11317. PubMed ID: 37365430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The potential of a nomogram combined PI-RADS v2.1 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer diagnostics.
Liu Y; Wang S; Xiang LH; Xu G; Dong L; Sun Y; Ye B; Zhang Y; Xu H
Br J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 95(1138):20220209. PubMed ID: 35877385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Castellani D; Cecchini S; Mazzucchelli R; Soraci L; Di Rosa M; Fabbietti P; Palagonia E; Puccio F; Carnevali F; Paci E; Montironi R; Galosi AB
Urol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 40(8):379.e1-379.e8. PubMed ID: 35662497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The value of machine learning models based on biparametric MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer].
Qiao XM; Hu CH; Hu S; Hu CH; Wang XM; Shen JK; Ji LB; Song Y; Bao J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 May; 103(19):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 37198106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep learning-based radiomic nomograms for predicting Ki67 expression in prostate cancer.
Deng S; Ding J; Wang H; Mao G; Sun J; Hu J; Zhu X; Cheng Y; Ni G; Ao W
BMC Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(1):638. PubMed ID: 37422624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and External Validation of a Novel Nomogram to Predict the Probability of Pelvic Lymph-node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Molecular Imaging with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography.
Vis AN; Meijer D; Roberts MJ; Siriwardana AR; Morton A; Yaxley JW; Samaratunga H; Emmett L; van de Ven PM; Heymans MW; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Boellaard TN; Schoots IG; Stricker P; Haynes AM; Oprea-Lager DE; Coughlin GD; van Leeuwen PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):553-563. PubMed ID: 37045707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning-based radiomics model to predict benign and malignant PI-RADS v2.1 category 3 lesions: a retrospective multi-center study.
Jin P; Shen J; Yang L; Zhang J; Shen A; Bao J; Wang X
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):47. PubMed ID: 36991347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Nomogram to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Targeted Biopsy for Index Lesion.
Kim MJ; Park SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Apr; 55(4):1226-1233. PubMed ID: 34296803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the Grade of Prostate Cancer Based on a Biparametric MRI Radiomics Signature.
Zhang L; Zhe X; Tang M; Zhang J; Ren J; Zhang X; Li L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():7830909. PubMed ID: 35024015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction and Validation of a Clinical Predictive Nomogram for Improving the Cancer Detection of Prostate Naive Biopsy Based on Chinese Multicenter Clinical Data.
Tao T; Wang C; Liu W; Yuan L; Ge Q; Zhang L; He B; Wang L; Wang L; Xiang C; Wang H; Chen S; Xiao J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():811866. PubMed ID: 35127526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.
Chen T; Li M; Gu Y; Zhang Y; Yang S; Wei C; Wu J; Li X; Zhao W; Shen J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):875-884. PubMed ID: 30230108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Could Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help to Identify the Presence of Prostate Cancer Before Initial Biopsy? The Development of Nomogram Predicting the Outcomes of Prostate Biopsy in the Chinese Population.
Fang D; Zhao C; Ren D; Yu W; Wang R; Wang H; Li X; Yin W; Yu X; Yang K; Liu P; Shan G; Li S; He Q; Wang X; Xin Z; Zhou L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4284-4292. PubMed ID: 27464612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
