These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38037087)

  • 61. Association of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy With Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs, 2003 to 2015.
    Jeong IG; Khandwala YS; Kim JH; Han DH; Li S; Wang Y; Chang SL; Chung BI
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1561-1568. PubMed ID: 29067427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Robotic single-site versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-matched analysis of short- and long-term costs.
    Hagen ME; Balaphas A; Podetta M; Rohner P; Jung MK; Buchs NC; Buehler L; Mendoza JM; Morel P
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1550-1555. PubMed ID: 29052069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.
    Ros A; Gustafsson L; Krook H; Nordgren CE; Thorell A; Wallin G; Nilsson E
    Ann Surg; 2001 Dec; 234(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 11729380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
    Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients.
    Kelley JE; Burrus RG; Burns RP; Graham LD; Chandler KE
    Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8480927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and efficient in the treatment of surgical biliary disease: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wiseman JE; Hsu CH; Oviedo RJ
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Feb; 17(1):147-154. PubMed ID: 35403958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Risk Factors for Open Conversion in Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy.
    Gangemi A; Danilkowicz R; Bianco F; Masrur M; Giulianotti PC
    JSLS; 2017; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 29238153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Outcomes of Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis in laparoscopic era: A retrospective Cohort study.
    Alvi AR; Jalbani I; Murtaza G; Hameed A
    J Minim Access Surg; 2013 Jul; 9(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 24019688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.
    Altieri MS; Yang J; Telem DA; Zhu J; Halbert C; Talamini M; Pryor AD
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):925-33. PubMed ID: 26139489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Robotic-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Outcomes From High-Volume Thoracic Surgeons.
    Reddy RM; Gorrepati ML; Oh DS; Mehendale S; Reed MF
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Sep; 106(3):902-908. PubMed ID: 29704479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Minimally invasive approach (robotic and laparoscopic) to biliary-enteric fistula secondary to cholecystectomy bile duct injury.
    Cuendis-Velázquez A; Trejo-Ávila ME; Rodríguez-Parra A; Bada-Yllán O; Morales-Chávez C; Fernández-Álvarez L; Cárdenas-Lailson E; Romero-Loera S; Rojano-Rodríguez M; Moreno-Portillo M
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):509-515. PubMed ID: 29280060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Operating costs, fiscal impact, value analysis and guidance for the routine use of robotic technology in abdominal surgical procedures.
    Quilici PJ; Wolberg H; McConnell N
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1433-1443. PubMed ID: 33835252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Fluorescent cholangiography significantly improves patient outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Broderick RC; Lee AM; Cheverie JN; Zhao B; Blitzer RR; Patel RJ; Soltero S; Sandler BJ; Jacobsen GR; Doucet JJ; Horgan S
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Oct; 35(10):5729-5739. PubMed ID: 33052527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Aguayo E; Dobaria V; Nakhla M; Seo YJ; Hadaya J; Cho NY; Sareh S; Sanaiha Y; Benharash P
    Surgery; 2020 Oct; 168(4):625-630. PubMed ID: 32762874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Prospective, multicenter, pairwise analysis of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: early results from the Prospective Hernia Study.
    LeBlanc K; Dickens E; Gonzalez A; Gamagami R; Pierce R; Balentine C; Voeller G;
    Hernia; 2020 Oct; 24(5):1069-1081. PubMed ID: 32495043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
    Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Edwards MA
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1573-1584. PubMed ID: 31209611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Surgical resection of T4 colon cancers: an NCDB propensity score-matched analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.
    Parascandola SA; Horsey ML; Hota S; Sparks AD; Tampo MMT; Kim G; Obias V
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):701-710. PubMed ID: 33104963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The heavy price of conversion from laparoscopic to open procedures for emergent cholecystectomies.
    Shah AA; Bhatti UF; Petrosyan M; Washington G; Nizam W; Williams M; Tran D; Cornwell EE; Fullum TM
    Am J Surg; 2019 Apr; 217(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 30638727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The effect of surgical strategy in difficult cholecystectomy cases on postoperative complications outcome: a value-based healthcare comparative study.
    Cremer K; Kloppenberg FWH; Vanhommerig JW; Dijksman LM; Bode N; Donkervoort SC
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):5293-5302. PubMed ID: 35000001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic elective colectomy: where are the benefits?
    Kulaylat AS; Mirkin KA; Puleo FJ; Hollenbeak CS; Messaris E
    J Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 224():72-78. PubMed ID: 29506855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.