These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38037687)

  • 1. No difference in patient-reported outcomes with cruciate-retaining, anterior-stabilized, and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty designs.
    Rehman Y; Korsvold AM; Lerdal A; Aamodt A
    Bone Joint J; 2023 Dec; 105-B(12):1271-1278. PubMed ID: 38037687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Better Flexion but Unaffected Satisfaction After Treatment With Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty - 2-year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial.
    Tille E; Beyer F; Lützner C; Postler A; Lützner J
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb; 39(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 37598783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.
    Ishii Y; Noguchi H; Sato J; Sakurai T; Toyabe SI
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3536-3542. PubMed ID: 27485124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Cruciate-Sacrificing vs Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacement Using a Contemporary Total Knee System.
    Bernasek TL; Stoops TK; Gill M; Engel C; Simon P
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 34563437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effectiveness comparison of partial versus intact posterior cruciate ligament-retaining in total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining prosthesis].
    Zhang B; Lin Y; Ren S; Chen T; Zhao X; Yu Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 35(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 33448199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lützner J; Beyer F; Dexel J; Fritzsche H; Lützner C; Kirschner S
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3515-3521. PubMed ID: 27659044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No Difference in Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
    van den Boom LGH; Brouwer RW; van den Akker-Scheek I; Reininga IHF; de Vries AJ; Bierma-Zeinstra SMA; van Raay JJAM
    J Knee Surg; 2020 Dec; 33(12):1243-1250. PubMed ID: 31284323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different intraoperative kinematics with comparable clinical outcomes of ultracongruent and posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Kim TW; Lee SM; Seong SC; Lee S; Jang J; Lee MC
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Sep; 24(9):3036-3043. PubMed ID: 25567541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Single Surgeon Series Comparing the Outcomes of a Cruciate Retaining and Medially Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Kinematic Alignment Principles.
    French SR; Munir S; Brighton R
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):422-428. PubMed ID: 31611163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinctions of introarticular force distribution between genesis-II posterior stabilized and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: An intraoperative comparative study of 45 patients.
    Tang H; Chen H; Yang D; Jiang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Feb; 42():1-8. PubMed ID: 28042976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PCL retained is safe in medial pivot TKA-a prospective randomized trial.
    Budhiparama NC; Lumban-Gaol I; Novito K; Hidayat H; De Meo F; Cacciola G; Cavaliere P
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5856-5863. PubMed ID: 37962615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention versus Posterior Stabilization for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
    Jiang C; Liu Z; Wang Y; Bian Y; Feng B; Weng X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147865. PubMed ID: 26824368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Higher Frequency of Reoperation With a New Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Christensen JC; Brothers J; Stoddard GJ; Anderson MB; Pelt CE; Gililland JM; Peters CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27043727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of clinical outcomes among total knee arthroplasties using posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, bi-cruciate substituting, bi-cruciate retaining designs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Sun K; Wu Y; Wu L; Shen B
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2023 Aug; 136(15):1817-1831. PubMed ID: 37365688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior cruciate-substituting total knee replacement recovers the flexion arc faster in the early postoperative period in knees with high varus deformity: a prospective randomized study.
    Öztürk A; Akalın Y; Çevik N; Otuzbir A; Özkan Y; Dostabakan Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Jul; 136(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 27271754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    van den Boom LG; Brouwer RW; van den Akker-Scheek I; Bulstra SK; van Raaij JJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Sep; 10():119. PubMed ID: 19793397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Contact Kinematics in Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty at Long-Term Follow-Up.
    Broberg JS; Ndoja S; MacDonald SJ; Lanting BA; Teeter MG
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jan; 35(1):272-277. PubMed ID: 31473060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of Posterior-Stabilized Compared with Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Longo UG; Ciuffreda M; Mannering N; D'Andrea V; Locher J; Salvatore G; Denaro V
    J Knee Surg; 2018 Apr; 31(4):321-340. PubMed ID: 28666292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional Outcomes are Comparable Between Posterior Stabilized and Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs at Short-Term Follow-up.
    Yacovelli S; Grau LC; Hozack WJ; Courtney PM
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Mar; 36(3):986-990. PubMed ID: 32994108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement.
    Dowsey MM; Gould DJ; Spelman T; Pandy MG; Choong PF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1583-1590.e2. PubMed ID: 32139194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.