161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38038766)
1. Association of clinicopathologic and molecular factors with the occurrence of positive margins in breast cancer.
Praveen Kumar A; Vicente D; Liu J; Raj-Kumar PK; Deyarmin B; Lin X; Shriver CD; Hu H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Feb; 204(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 38038766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
Obedian E; Haffty BG
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination.
Pata G; Bartoli M; Bianchi A; Pasini M; Roncali S; Ragni F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2802-8. PubMed ID: 27034079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HER-2 positive breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of positive cavity margins after initial lumpectomy.
Jia H; Jia W; Yang Y; Li S; Feng H; Liu J; Rao N; Jin L; Wu J; Gu R; Zhu L; Chen K; Deng H; Zeng Y; Liu Q; Song E; Su F
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 12():289. PubMed ID: 25241216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.
Lai HW; Huang RH; Wu YT; Chen CJ; Chen ST; Lin YJ; Chen DR; Lee CW; Wu HK; Lin HY; Kuo SJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1725-1735. PubMed ID: 30120037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.
Leong C; Boyages J; Jayasinghe UW; Bilous M; Ung O; Chua B; Salisbury E; Wong AY
Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1823-32. PubMed ID: 15112262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Margin status and survival outcomes after breast cancer conservation surgery: prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bundred JR; Michael S; Stuart B; Cutress RI; Beckmann K; Holleczek B; Dahlstrom JE; Gath J; Dodwell D; Bundred NJ
BMJ; 2022 Sep; 378():e070346. PubMed ID: 36130770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.
Torabi R; Hsu CH; Patel PN; Dave H; Bouton ME; Komenaka IK
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Mar; 398(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23184267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of surgical margins on the outcome of breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
Bernardi S; Bertozzi S; Londero AP; Gentile G; Angione V; Petri R
World J Surg; 2014 Sep; 38(9):2279-87. PubMed ID: 24819382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management.
Morrow M; Abrahamse P; Hofer TP; Ward KC; Hamilton AS; Kurian AW; Katz SJ; Jagsi R
JAMA Oncol; 2017 Oct; 3(10):1352-1357. PubMed ID: 28586788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy.
Lupe K; Truong PT; Alexander C; Lesperance M; Speers C; Tyldesley S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):e561-8. PubMed ID: 21514069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Involved margins after lumpectomy for breast cancer: Always to be re-excised?
Sorrentino L; Agozzino M; Albasini S; Bossi D; Mazzucchelli S; Vanna R; Papadopoulou O; Villani L; Corsi F
Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():141-146. PubMed ID: 31500779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins.
Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is biological subtype prognostic of locoregional recurrence risk in women with pT1-2N0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy?
Truong PT; Sadek BT; Lesperance MF; Alexander CS; Shenouda M; Raad RA; Taghian AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jan; 88(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 24161421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
