These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38041161)
21. Coronavirus disease (COVID 2019): protocol for a living overview of systematic reviews. Lu C; Lu T; Pan B; Wang Q; Hou L; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Wang Y; Li X; Ruan Y; Chen L; Lai H; Qin T; Ge L; Yan K Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Feb; 10(2):1488-1493. PubMed ID: 33353349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines. Zhang X; Aixinjueluo QY; Li SY; Song LL; Lau CT; Tan R; Bian ZX Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):302. PubMed ID: 31796121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review. Hennessy EA; Tanner-Smith EE; Finch AJ; Sathe N; Kugley S Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-86. PubMed ID: 37131375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Page MJ; Moher D Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Software tools for literature screening in systematic reviews in biomedical research. Van der Mierden S; Tsaioun K; Bleich A; Leenaars CHC ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31113000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 30670086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Park SY; Kim HT; Heo I; Hwang MS; Hwang EH; Shin BC Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(44):e31472. PubMed ID: 36343045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews. Li J; Li YX; Luo LJ; Ye J; Zhong DL; Xiao QW; Zheng H; Geng CM; Jin RJ; Liang FR Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jul; 98(28):e16301. PubMed ID: 31305415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines. Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann T; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():60-68. PubMed ID: 31740319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions. Le JT; Qureshi R; Twose C; Rosman L; Han G; Fapohunda K; Saldanha IJ; Scherer RW; Lum F; Al-Rajhi A; Musch DC; Hawkins BS; Dickersin K; Li T JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 137(12):1399-1405. PubMed ID: 31600387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Utilization of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Stroke Guidelines. Ghozy S; Kobeissi H; Amoukhteh M; Kadirvel R; Brinjikji W; Rabinstein AA; Carpenter CR; Kallmes DF Brain Sci; 2024 Jul; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 39061468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interventions for preventing influenza: An overview of Cochrane systematic reviews and a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Yuan Y; Wang RT; Xia J; Cao HJ J Integr Med; 2021 Nov; 19(6):503-514. PubMed ID: 34544670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews. Kim JSM; Pollock M; Kaunelis D; Weeks L Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):206. PubMed ID: 36167611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey. Cheung AKL; Wong CHL; Ho L; Wu IXY; Ke FYT; Chung VCH BMC Complement Med Ther; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35197038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-Third of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) System to Evaluate Certainty of Evidence: A Meta-Research Study. Gianola S; Bargeri S; Nembrini G; Varvello A; Lunny C; Castellini G Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Mar; 104(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 36167119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study. Justesen T; Freyberg J; Schultz ANØ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33941105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR. Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conflict of Evidence: Resolving Discrepancies When Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-analyses Disagree. Sylvester RJ; Canfield SE; Lam TB; Marconi L; MacLennan S; Yuan Y; MacLennan G; Norrie J; Omar MI; Bruins HM; Hernández V; Plass K; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 27914898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]