BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38042348)

  • 1. Evaluation of nasolacrimal canal morphology in different facial skeletal relationships.
    Krishnanunni K; Parameswaran A; Tangutur SP
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 125(3):101722. PubMed ID: 38042348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A case of atresia of the nasolacrimal passage with cleft lip and palate].
    Hayashi K; Katori N; Kasai K; Kamisasanuki T; Kokubo K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 May; 117(5):433-7. PubMed ID: 23855236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of Nasolacrimal Duct Morphometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip/Palate.
    Altun O; Dedeoğlu N; Avci M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):e725-e728. PubMed ID: 28891896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological and morphometric evaluation of lacrimal groove.
    Ipek E; Esin K; Amac K; Mustafa G; Candan A
    Anat Sci Int; 2007 Dec; 82(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 18062149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of bony nasolacrimal parameters among Asians.
    Yong AM; Zhao DB; Siew SC; Goh PS; Liao J; Amrith S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014; 30(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 25069069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fusiform enlargement of the nasolacrimal canal: a rare anatomic variation.
    Siricki A; Bayazit Y; Bayram M; Inaloz S
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2001 Jun; 23(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 11490926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Morphometric characteristics and correlation interdependence of the lacrimal sac fossa and nasolacrimal canal in cerebral and facial parts of the skull of various shape].
    Gaĭvoronskiĭ IV; Gaĭvoronskiĭ AV; Tvardovskaia MV; Bochkarev IA
    Morfologiia; 2004; 126(6):50-4. PubMed ID: 15839253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nasolacrimal canal morphology with or without idiopathic obstruction in Caucasian adults: a multidetector CT study.
    Ulutas HG; Yazici B; Ulutas E; Yazici Z
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1727-1735. PubMed ID: 35079938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive medial maxillectomy and the position of nasolacrimal duct: the CT study.
    Sieskiewicz A; Buczko K; Janica J; Lukasiewicz A; Lebkowska U; Piszczatowski B; Olszewska E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1515-1519. PubMed ID: 27844224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A retrospective comparison of craniofacial form in Northern Irish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Leonard AG; Kneafsey B; McKenna S; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Sep; 35(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 9761558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Soft-Tissue Evaluation in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Alpagan Ozdemir S; Esenlik E
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Nov; 24():8608-8620. PubMed ID: 30484438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complex Stenoses and CT Features of the Nasolacrimal Canal in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Fayet B; Racy E; Bordonné C; Katowitz JA; Katowitz WR; Brémond-Gignac D
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019; 35(6):594-599. PubMed ID: 31206460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomic characteristics of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a comparative computed tomography study.
    Wang W; Gong L; Wang Y
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Nov; 12(11):5068-5079. PubMed ID: 36330196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P-A cephalometric analysis of nonoperated adult cleft lip and palate.
    Motohashi N; Kuroda T; Capelozza Filho L; Freitas JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 May; 31(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 8068702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Persistent epiphora after endonasal ENT surgery: CT dacryography findings.
    Nguyen TH; Venturelli N; Espinoza S; Keller P; Piaton JM; Habas C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Mar; 45(3):306-313. PubMed ID: 35123815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of nasal airflow resistance of operated unilateral cleft lip and palate surgery patients compared with skeletal class III individuals.
    Ataol M; Ertaş Ü
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 137():110188. PubMed ID: 32682165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasolacrimal duct orifice cysts in adults: a previously unrecognized, easily treatable cause of epiphora.
    DelGaudio JM; Wojno T
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Oct; 117(10):1830-3. PubMed ID: 17690605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphometric Evaluation of Bony Nasolacrimal Canal in a Caucasian Population with Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Multidetector Computed Tomography Study.
    Bulbul E; Yazici A; Yanik B; Yazici H; Demirpolat G
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 26957913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative lacrimal intubation to prevent epiphora as a result of injury to the nasolacrimal system after fracture of the naso-orbitoethmoid complex.
    Iwai T; Yasumura K; Yabuki Y; Omura S; Matsui Y; Kobayashi S; Fujimaki R; Okubo M; Tohnai I; Maegawa J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 51(7):e165-8. PubMed ID: 22853979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the maxilla in unilateral cleft lip and palate: implications for rhinoplasty.
    Agarwal R; Parihar A; Mandhani PA; Chandra R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1338-42. PubMed ID: 22948621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.