These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38042348)

  • 1. Evaluation of nasolacrimal canal morphology in different facial skeletal relationships.
    Krishnanunni K; Parameswaran A; Tangutur SP
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 125(3):101722. PubMed ID: 38042348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A case of atresia of the nasolacrimal passage with cleft lip and palate].
    Hayashi K; Katori N; Kasai K; Kamisasanuki T; Kokubo K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 May; 117(5):433-7. PubMed ID: 23855236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of Nasolacrimal Duct Morphometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip/Palate.
    Altun O; Dedeoğlu N; Avci M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):e725-e728. PubMed ID: 28891896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological and morphometric evaluation of lacrimal groove.
    Ipek E; Esin K; Amac K; Mustafa G; Candan A
    Anat Sci Int; 2007 Dec; 82(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 18062149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of bony nasolacrimal parameters among Asians.
    Yong AM; Zhao DB; Siew SC; Goh PS; Liao J; Amrith S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014; 30(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 25069069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fusiform enlargement of the nasolacrimal canal: a rare anatomic variation.
    Siricki A; Bayazit Y; Bayram M; Inaloz S
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2001 Jun; 23(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 11490926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Morphometric characteristics and correlation interdependence of the lacrimal sac fossa and nasolacrimal canal in cerebral and facial parts of the skull of various shape].
    Gaĭvoronskiĭ IV; Gaĭvoronskiĭ AV; Tvardovskaia MV; Bochkarev IA
    Morfologiia; 2004; 126(6):50-4. PubMed ID: 15839253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nasolacrimal canal morphology with or without idiopathic obstruction in Caucasian adults: a multidetector CT study.
    Ulutas HG; Yazici B; Ulutas E; Yazici Z
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1727-1735. PubMed ID: 35079938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive medial maxillectomy and the position of nasolacrimal duct: the CT study.
    Sieskiewicz A; Buczko K; Janica J; Lukasiewicz A; Lebkowska U; Piszczatowski B; Olszewska E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1515-1519. PubMed ID: 27844224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A retrospective comparison of craniofacial form in Northern Irish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Leonard AG; Kneafsey B; McKenna S; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Sep; 35(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 9761558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Soft-Tissue Evaluation in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Alpagan Ozdemir S; Esenlik E
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Nov; 24():8608-8620. PubMed ID: 30484438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complex Stenoses and CT Features of the Nasolacrimal Canal in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Fayet B; Racy E; Bordonné C; Katowitz JA; Katowitz WR; Brémond-Gignac D
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019; 35(6):594-599. PubMed ID: 31206460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomic characteristics of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a comparative computed tomography study.
    Wang W; Gong L; Wang Y
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Nov; 12(11):5068-5079. PubMed ID: 36330196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P-A cephalometric analysis of nonoperated adult cleft lip and palate.
    Motohashi N; Kuroda T; Capelozza Filho L; Freitas JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 May; 31(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 8068702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Persistent epiphora after endonasal ENT surgery: CT dacryography findings.
    Nguyen TH; Venturelli N; Espinoza S; Keller P; Piaton JM; Habas C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Mar; 45(3):306-313. PubMed ID: 35123815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nasolacrimal duct orifice cysts in adults: a previously unrecognized, easily treatable cause of epiphora.
    DelGaudio JM; Wojno T
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Oct; 117(10):1830-3. PubMed ID: 17690605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of nasal airflow resistance of operated unilateral cleft lip and palate surgery patients compared with skeletal class III individuals.
    Ataol M; Ertaş Ü
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 137():110188. PubMed ID: 32682165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphometric Evaluation of Bony Nasolacrimal Canal in a Caucasian Population with Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Multidetector Computed Tomography Study.
    Bulbul E; Yazici A; Yanik B; Yazici H; Demirpolat G
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 26957913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative lacrimal intubation to prevent epiphora as a result of injury to the nasolacrimal system after fracture of the naso-orbitoethmoid complex.
    Iwai T; Yasumura K; Yabuki Y; Omura S; Matsui Y; Kobayashi S; Fujimaki R; Okubo M; Tohnai I; Maegawa J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 51(7):e165-8. PubMed ID: 22853979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the maxilla in unilateral cleft lip and palate: implications for rhinoplasty.
    Agarwal R; Parihar A; Mandhani PA; Chandra R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1338-42. PubMed ID: 22948621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.