These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38042738)

  • 1. Comparison of endothelial shear stress between ultrathin strut bioresorbable polymer drug-eluting stent vs durable-polymer drug-eluting stent post-stent implantation: An optical coherence tomography substudy from BIOFLOW II.
    Beyene S; Tufaro V; Garg M; Gkargkoulas F; Calderon AT; Safi H; Waksman R; Windecker S; Torii R; Melaku GD; Bulant CA; Bourantas CV; Blanco PJ; Garcia-Garcia HM
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Apr; 61():26-34. PubMed ID: 38042738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: BIOFLOW V Final 5-Year Outcomes.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 15(18):1852-1860. PubMed ID: 36137689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(11):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Very early neointimal coverage of new biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent evaluated by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Kobayashi N; Ito Y; Yamawaki M; Araki M; Sakai T; Sakamoto Y; Mori S; Tsutsumi M; Nauchi M; Honda Y; Tokuda T; Makino K; Shirai S; Hirano K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 29159531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neointimal characteristics comparison between biodegradable-polymer and durable-polymer drug-eluting stents: 3-month follow-up optical coherence tomography light property analysis from the RESTORE registry.
    Kobayashi T; Sotomi Y; Suzuki S; Hamanaka Y; Nakatani S; Dijkstra J; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Sakata Y; Hirayama A; Higuchi Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):205-215. PubMed ID: 31673850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrathin, Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent vs Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
    Nakamura M; Kadota K; Nakagawa Y; Tanabe K; Ito Y; Amano T; Maekawa Y; Takahashi A; Shiode N; Otsuka Y; Kawasaki T; Hikichi Y; Shite J; Kozuma K; Iijima R; Murakami Y;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jul; 15(13):1324-1334. PubMed ID: 35798475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.
    Dan K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Windecker S; Saito S; Kandzari DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009189. PubMed ID: 32895004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent to Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents.
    El-Hayek G; Bangalore S; Casso Dominguez A; Devireddy C; Jaber W; Kumar G; Mavromatis K; Tamis-Holland J; Samady H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):462-473. PubMed ID: 28279314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 6-month vascular healing response after bioresorbable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A randomized serial optical coherence tomography study.
    Noguchi M; Dohi T; Okazaki S; Matsumura M; Takeuchi M; Endo H; Kato Y; Okai I; Nishiyama H; Doi S; Iwata H; Isoda K; Usui E; Fujimura T; Seike F; Mintz GS; Miyauchi K; Daida H; Minamino T; Maehara A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):E677-E686. PubMed ID: 34357673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in US patients undergoing coronary revascularization: 1-Year outcomes from the BIOFLOW VII trial.
    Kandzari DE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Stoler RC; Wang J; Picone M; Ben-Dor I; Garcia SA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 37493431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
    Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial.
    Kandzari DE; Mauri L; Koolen JJ; Massaro JM; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    Lancet; 2017 Oct; 390(10105):1843-1852. PubMed ID: 28851504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difference of vascular healing between bioabsorbable-polymer and durable-polymer new generation drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomographic analysis.
    Matsuhiro Y; Nakamura D; Shutta R; Kawamura A; Nakamura H; Okamoto N; Matsunaga-Lee Y; Yano M; Egami Y; Sakata Y; Nishino M; Tanouchi J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Apr; 37(4):1131-1141. PubMed ID: 33165669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early vessel healing after implantation of biodegradable-polymer and durable-polymer drug-eluting stent: 3-month angioscopic evaluation of the RESTORE registry.
    Suzuki S; Sotomi Y; Kobayashi T; Hamanaka Y; Nakatani S; Shiojima I; Sakata Y; Hirayama A; Higuchi Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 35(6):973-980. PubMed ID: 30874980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrathin-strut versus thin-strut stent healing and outcomes in preclinical and clinical subjects.
    Ikegami R; Piao Z; Iglesias JF; Pilgrim T; Ha K; McCarthy JR; Castellanos MI; Kassab MB; Albagdadi MS; Mauskapf A; Spicer G; Kandzari DE; Edelman ER; Libby P; Heg D; Joner M; Tearney GJ; Jaffer FA
    EuroIntervention; 2024 May; 20(10):e669-e680. PubMed ID: 38776143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of bioresorbable vs durable polymer drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main (from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).
    Iannaccone M; Barbero U; De Benedictis M; Imori Y; Quadri G; Trabattoni D; Ryan N; Venuti G; Montabone A; Wojakowski W; Rognoni A; Helft G; Parma R; De Luca L; Autelli M; Boccuzzi G; Mattesini A; Templin C; Cerrato E; Wańha W; Smolka G; Huczek Z; Tomassini F; Cortese B; Capodanno D; Chieffo A; Nuñez-Gil I; Gili S; Bassignana A; di Mario C; Doronzo B; Omedè P; D'Amico M; Tedeschi D; Varbella F; Luscher T; Sheiban I; Escaned J; Rinaldi M; D'Ascenzo F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 May; 20(1):225. PubMed ID: 32414330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence of late-acquired stent malapposition of drug eluting stents with second generation permanent and biodegradable polymer coatings-A prospective, randomized comparison using optical coherence tomography.
    Roth C; Gangl C; Dalos D; Delle-Karth G; Neunteufl T; Berger R
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):780-791. PubMed ID: 30479028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.