BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38045498)

  • 1. Acceptance of Elective Single-embryo Transfer in a Resource-limited Setting: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-based Study.
    Jayakumar NP; Solanki M; Karuppusami R; Joseph T; Kunjummen AT; Kamath MS
    J Hum Reprod Sci; 2023; 16(3):233-241. PubMed ID: 38045498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.
    Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Knowledge, anxiety levels and attitudes of infertile couples towards COVID-19 and its impact on self-funded fertility treatment: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.
    Kamath MS; Joseph T; Karuppusami R; Chinta P; Pal A; Nallamilli SR; Sarkar S; Poobalan A; Kunjummen AT
    Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(4):hoab039. PubMed ID: 35187270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One Plus One Is Better Than Two: Cumulative Reproductive Outcomes Are Better after Two Elective Single Blastocyst Embryo Transfers Compared to One Double Blastocyst Embryo Transfer.
    Mehta VP; Patel JA; Gupta RH; Shah SI; Banker MR
    J Hum Reprod Sci; 2018; 11(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 30158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
    van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
    Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.
    Tobias T; Sharara FI; Franasiak JM; Heiser PW; Pinckney-Clark E
    Fertil Res Pract; 2016; 2():1. PubMed ID: 28620526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer of 2 Embryos Using a Double-Embryo Transfer Protocol Versus 2 Sequential Single-Embryo Transfers: The Impact on Multiple Pregnancy.
    Monteleone PAA; Peregrino PFM; Baracat EC; Serafini PC
    Reprod Sci; 2018 Oct; 25(10):1501-1508. PubMed ID: 29558870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles.
    van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Land JA; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 15550492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adherence to embryo transfer guidelines in favorable-prognosis patients aged less than 35 years using autologous oocytes and in recipients using donor oocytes: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study.
    Gingold JA; Fazzari M; Gerber R; Kappy M; Goodman M; Lieman H; Pollack S; Singh M; Jindal S
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):548-559. PubMed ID: 35058041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Single embryo transfer does not compromise the pregnancy rate in patients with good IVF/ICSI prognosis].
    Koryntová D; Moosová M; Rezábek K; Pavelková I; Mára M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2005 Nov; 70(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 17955795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.
    van Heesch MM; van Asselt AD; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 27907897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elective freezing of embryos versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF: a multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK (E-Freeze).
    Maheshwari A; Bell JL; Bhide P; Brison D; Child T; Chong HY; Cheong Y; Cole C; Coomarasamy A; Cutting R; Hardy P; Hamoda H; Juszczak E; Khalaf Y; Kurinczuk JJ; Lavery S; Linsell L; Macklon N; Mathur R; Pundir J; Raine-Fenning N; Rajkohwa M; Scotland G; Stanbury K; Troup S; Bhattacharya S
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):476-487. PubMed ID: 34999830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer.
    Murray S; Shetty A; Rattray A; Taylor V; Bhattacharya S
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):911-6. PubMed ID: 14990543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing couples' preferences for fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a discrete choice experiment.
    Abdulrahim B; Scotland G; Bhattacharya S; Maheshwari A
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2891-2903. PubMed ID: 34550368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
    Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome and feasibility of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy for the first and second IVF/ICSI attempts.
    Gremeau AS; Brugnon F; Bouraoui Z; Pekrishvili R; Janny L; Pouly JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jan; 160(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 22178171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
    Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience].
    Leniaud L; Poncelet C; Porcher R; Martin-Pont B; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Wolf JP; Sifer C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Feb; 36(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 18255330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.