These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38046188)

  • 1. Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews.
    Bell K; Kingori P; Mills D
    Sci Technol Human Values; 2024 Jan; 49(1):78-104. PubMed ID: 38046188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valuable Research in Fake Journals and Self-boasting with Fake Metrics.
    Samuel AJ; Aranha VP
    J Pediatr Neurosci; 2018; 13(4):517-518. PubMed ID: 30937105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Journal publication ethics and implications for life science researchers: a COPE perspective.
    Lane T
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2018 Dec; 2(6):763-767. PubMed ID: 33530669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.
    Strinzel M; Severin A; Milzow K; Egger M
    mBio; 2019 Jun; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 31164459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing.
    Kulczycki E; Rozkosz EA; Engels TCE; Guns R; Hołowiecki M; Pölönen J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214423. PubMed ID: 30908515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles.
    Huh S
    Neurointervention; 2023 Mar; 18(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 36720475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.
    Björk BC
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e115. PubMed ID: 22173122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review.
    Ng JY; Cobey KD; Ahmed S; Chow V; Maduranayagam SG; Santoro LJ; Sikora L; Marusic A; Shanahan D; Townsend R; Ehrlich A; Iorio A; Moher D
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282168. PubMed ID: 37000832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fake Journals: Their Features and Some Viable Ways to Distinguishing Them.
    Hemmat Esfe M; Wongwises S; Asadi A; Akbari M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):821-4. PubMed ID: 25230907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current market rates for scholarly publishing services.
    Grossmann A; Brembs B
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():20. PubMed ID: 34316354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them.
    Elmore SA; Weston EH
    Toxicol Pathol; 2020 Jun; 48(4):607-610. PubMed ID: 32319351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.
    Beall J
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Feb; 98(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 26829665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Junk science for sale Sham journals proliferating online.
    Klyce W; Feller E
    R I Med J (2013); 2017 Jul; 100(7):27-29. PubMed ID: 28686237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Gerasimov AN; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 25829801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review.
    Pérez-Neri I; Pineda C; Sandoval H
    Clin Rheumatol; 2022 Jul; 41(7):2241-2248. PubMed ID: 35524149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to write a scholarly book review for publication in a peer-reviewed journal: a review of the literature.
    Lee AD; Green BN; Johnson CD; Nyquist J
    J Chiropr Educ; 2010; 24(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 20480015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scholarly Black Market.
    Sorooshian S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Apr; 23(2):623-624. PubMed ID: 27325415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview.
    Qi X; Deng H; Guo X
    Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.
    Fernandez-Llimos F;
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2018; 16(1):1236. PubMed ID: 29619142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.