142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38048002)
1. Evaluating the symmetric and asymmetric effectiveness of low carbon energy consumption for ecological footprint in China: the role of environment-related technological innovation.
Jin X; Guo C; Ahmad W; Ameen MS; Abbas S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(2):1926-1940. PubMed ID: 38048002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heading towards sustainable environment: exploring the dynamic linkage among selected macroeconomic variables and ecological footprint using a novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach.
Islam MS; Hossain ME; Khan MA; Rana MJ; Ema NS; Bekun FV
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(15):22260-22279. PubMed ID: 34782980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analyzing asymmetric ecological performance under structural change, technological innovation, and trade diversification: fresh insights from the USA.
Islam MM; Ahmad P; Shabir M; Usman M; Kamal M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(54):115164-115184. PubMed ID: 37878170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of technological innovation and renewable energy on ecological footprint in G20 countries: The moderating role of institutional quality.
Raza A; Habib Y; Hashmi SH
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(42):95376-95393. PubMed ID: 37544946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The symmetric and asymmetric impacts of green energy, eco-innovation, and urbanization in explaining low-carbon economy for Pakistan.
Ullah K; Abbas S; Tariq M; Mahmood N; Kaechele H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(12):33375-33395. PubMed ID: 36478536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The paradigms of transport energy consumption and technological innovation as a panacea for sustainable environment: is there any asymmetric association?
Tanveer A; Song H; Faheem M; Daud A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):20469-20489. PubMed ID: 36255583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ecological footprint analysis of the phosphorus industry in China.
Li B; Danish ; Khan SU; Haneklaus N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(48):73461-73479. PubMed ID: 35624364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in terms of ecological footprint and CO
Acaroğlu H; Kartal HM; García Márquez FP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):63289-63304. PubMed ID: 36961642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Achieving Environmental Sustainability in Africa: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption, Natural Resources, and Government Effectiveness-Evidence from Symmetric and Asymmetric ARDL Models.
Yang L; Bashiru Danwana S; Issahaku FY
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technological innovation, militarization, and environmental change: evidence from BRICS economies.
Zhu H; Chang S; Chen B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; 31(16):23909-23923. PubMed ID: 38430445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mediation of foreign direct investment and agriculture towards ecological footprint: a shift from single perspective to a more inclusive perspective for India.
Udemba EN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(21):26817-26834. PubMed ID: 32378112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation?
Kihombo S; Ahmed Z; Chen S; Adebayo TS; Kirikkaleli D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(43):61235-61245. PubMed ID: 34170468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heading towards sustainable environment: does renewable and non-renewable energy generation matter for the effect of industrialization and urbanization on ecological footprint? Evidence from China.
Hao Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(12):34282-34295. PubMed ID: 36508099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of technological innovation and diffusion, energy consumption and financial development in affecting ecological footprint in BRICS: an empirical analysis.
Rout SK; Gupta M; Sahoo M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(17):25318-25335. PubMed ID: 34841485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The asymmetric impact of financial development on ecological footprint in Pakistan.
Gill AR; Riaz R; Ali M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(11):30755-30765. PubMed ID: 36441317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: do technological innovation and financial development matter?
Yang B; Jahanger A; Ali M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(18):23482-23500. PubMed ID: 33449318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of financial development on carbon, non-carbon, and total ecological footprint in Nigeria: new evidence from asymmetric dynamic analysis.
Omoke PC; Nwani C; Effiong EL; Evbuomwan OO; Emenekwe CC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(17):21628-21646. PubMed ID: 32279250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, energy technology investment, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in the United States: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with novel Fourier estimation.
Apergis N; Degirmenci T; Aydin M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Dec; 30(60):125570-125584. PubMed ID: 38001298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Policy inference from technological innovation, renewable energy, and financial development for sustainable development goals (SDGs): insight from asymmetric and bootstrap Granger causality approaches.
Udemba EN; Emir F; Khan NU; Hussain S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(39):59104-59117. PubMed ID: 35380330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revisiting the nexus between digital trade, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in BRICS economies.
Yuerong H; Javaid MQ; Ali MSE; Zada M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(6):8585-8607. PubMed ID: 38180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
