These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Can salient stimuli really be suppressed? Chang S; Egeth HE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):260-269. PubMed ID: 33241528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Pang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Nan W; Fu S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 38491317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proactive suppression can be applied to multiple salient distractors in visual search. Drisdelle BL; Eimer M J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2504-2519. PubMed ID: 37126051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing. He X; Liu W; Qin N; Lyu L; Dong X; Bao M Psychophysiology; 2021 Dec; 58(12):e13920. PubMed ID: 34383329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology. Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets. Töllner T; Conci M; Müller HJ Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Mar; 36(3):935-44. PubMed ID: 25351495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection. Biggs AT; Gibson BS J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceptual learning induces active suppression of physically nonsalient shapes. Hu L; Ding Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13393. PubMed ID: 31087676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task. Irons JL; Remington RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):862-75. PubMed ID: 23444082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation. Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search. Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]