These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38049572)

  • 41. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
    Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The meaning of the mask matters: evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):775-9. PubMed ID: 16181439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.
    Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision.
    van Zoest W; Huber-Huber C; Weaver MD; Hickey C
    J Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 41(33):7120-7135. PubMed ID: 34244360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction.
    de Vries IEJ; Savran E; van Driel J; Olivers CNL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1873-1894. PubMed ID: 31418334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Electrophysiological evidence for target facilitation without distractor suppression in two-stimulus search displays.
    Forschack N; Gundlach C; Hillyard S; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Aug; 32(17):3816-3828. PubMed ID: 35034125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Difficulty suppressing visual distraction while dual tasking.
    McDonald JJ; Gaspar JM; Lagroix HEP; Jolicœur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Feb; 30(1):224-234. PubMed ID: 36002716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1740-50. PubMed ID: 26420441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V; Harris IM
    Cognition; 2006 Apr; 99(3):355-82. PubMed ID: 15993401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attentional capture is modulated by stimulus saliency in visual search as evidenced by event-related potentials and alpha oscillations.
    Forschack N; Gundlach C; Hillyard S; Müller MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):685-704. PubMed ID: 36525202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Relative saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of color and face singleton distractors: evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Zhang Y; Zhang H; Fu S
    Cereb Cortex; 2024 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 38679483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Ignoring the unknown: Attentional suppression of unpredictable visual distraction.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36227324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Top-down deactivation of interference from irrelevant spatial or verbal stimulus features.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2360-74. PubMed ID: 24980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.