133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38049967)
21. Ga-PSMA PET/CT Staging of Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Kuten J; Mabjeesh NJ; Lerman H; Levine C; Barnes S; Even-Sapir E
Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Feb; 21(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30772960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22.
Esen T; Falay O; Tarim K; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Kilic M; Seymen H; Sarikaya AF; Kiremit MC; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Baydar DE; Kordan Y; Demirkol MO; Tilki D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for staging of high-risk prostate cancer68Ga-PSMA PET and MRI in prostate cancer.
Tulsyan S; Das CJ; Tripathi M; Seth A; Kumar R; Bal C
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1094-1102. PubMed ID: 28957842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. De Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer Presenting With Atypical Lower-Limb Skeletal Metastases Detected on 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT.
Yip A; Yap J
Clin Nucl Med; 2024 Jul; 49(7):e346-e350. PubMed ID: 38687004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Isolated Liver Metastasis Detected by 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.
Önner H; Özer H; Çelik AV; Yilmaz F; Kara Gedik G
Clin Nucl Med; 2023 Mar; 48(3):259-260. PubMed ID: 36252917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Potential Impact of
Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The diagnostic accuracy of
Rajwa P; Heidenreich J; Drzezga A; Schmidt M; Shariat SF; Heidenreich A
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 37750292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31.
Hruby G; Eade T; Emmett L; Ho B; Hsiao E; Schembri G; Guo L; Kwong C; Hunter J; Byrne K; Kneebone A
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):343-346. PubMed ID: 29663686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Extent of disease in recurrent prostate cancer determined by [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT in relation to PSA levels, PSA doubling time and Gleason score.
Verburg FA; Pfister D; Heidenreich A; Vogg A; Drude NI; Vöö S; Mottaghy FM; Behrendt FF
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 26563121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33.
Zhou J; Wu R; Wang W; Zhao Y; Liu X
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 36576728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients.
Uslu-Beşli L; Sağer S; Akgün E; Asa S; Şahin OE; Demirdağ Ç; Güner E; Khosroshahi BR; Karayel E; Pehlivanoğlu H; Aygün A; Uslu İ; Talat Z; Sönmezoğlu K
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 49(1):301-310. PubMed ID: 30761859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Bone Uptake in Bone Scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT Images in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Acar E; Bekiş R; Polack B
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(6):589-594. PubMed ID: 32008568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (
van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk M; Nandurkar R; Stricker P; Ho B; Heijmink S; Wit EMK; Tillier C; van Muilenkom E; Nguyen Q; van der Poel HG; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.
Luiting HB; van Leeuwen PJ; Busstra MB; Brabander T; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Vis AN; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial.
de Feria Cardet RE; Hofman MS; Segard T; Yim J; Williams S; Francis RJ; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG; De Abreu Lourenco R
Eur Urol; 2021 Mar; 79(3):413-418. PubMed ID: 33341285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Head-To-Head Comparison of
Zhao G; Ji B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
