180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38050125)
1. Examining the Relationship and Prognostic Significance of Cell-Free DNA Levels and the PSMA-Positive Tumor Volume in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective-Prospective [
Kluge K; Einspieler H; Haberl D; Spielvogel C; Stoiber S; Vraka C; Papp L; Wunsch S; Egger G; Kramer G; Grubmüller B; Shariat S; Hacker M; Kenner L; Haug A
J Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 65(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 38050125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Shagera QA; Artigas C; Karfis I; Critchi G; Chanza NM; Sideris S; Peltier A; Paesmans M; Gil T; Flamen P
J Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1191-1198. PubMed ID: 34772793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [
Xie Y; Li C; Zhang L; Zang S; Yu F; Wang S; Wang F
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 42(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 36073212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of thresholding methods for the quantification of [
Kim M; Seifert R; Fragemann J; Kersting D; Murray J; Jonske F; Pomykala KL; Egger J; Fendler WP; Herrmann K; Kleesiek J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):2196-2209. PubMed ID: 36859618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential role of
Aggarwal P; Singh H; Das CK; Mavuduru RS; Kakkar N; Lal A; Gorsi U; Kumar R; Mittal BR
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 170():111218. PubMed ID: 38007857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of
Can C; Gündoğan C; Yildirim OA; Poyraz K; Güzel Y; Kömek H
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 33866336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semi-automatic evaluation of baseline whole-body tumor burden as an imaging biomarker of
Zou Q; Jiao J; Zou MH; Li MZ; Yang T; Xu L; Zhang Y
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4202-4213. PubMed ID: 32948911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraindividual comparison between
Spohn S; Jaegle C; Fassbender TF; Sprave T; Gkika E; Nicolay NH; Bock M; Ruf J; Benndorf M; Gratzke C; Grosu AL; Zamboglou C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Nov; 47(12):2796-2803. PubMed ID: 32342192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of whole-body tumour burden on [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT for response assessment of [177Lu]PSMA-617 radioligand therapy: a retrospective analysis of serum PSA level and imaging derived parameters before and after two cycles of therapy.
Michalski K; Mix M; Meyer PT; Ruf J
Nuklearmedizin; 2019 Dec; 58(6):443-450. PubMed ID: 31724145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Evaluation of
Lopci E; Lughezzani G; Castello A; Saita A; Colombo P; Hurle R; Peschechera R; Benetti A; Zandegiacomo S; Pasini L; Casale P; Pietro D; Bevilacqua G; Balzarini L; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):764-771. PubMed ID: 32312701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.
Schmidkonz C; Cordes M; Goetz TI; Prante O; Kuwert T; Ritt P; Uder M; Wullich B; Goebell P; Bäuerle T
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):766-775. PubMed ID: 31338731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the role of Ga-68 PSMA I&T PET/CT in response evaluation to docetaxel therapy in castration resistant prostate cancer patients.
Özülker T; Özülker F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(5):292-298. PubMed ID: 32595026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A single-center, multi-factor, retrospective study to improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary prostate cancer using [
Lv J; Yu H; Yin H; Shi Y; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Feb; 51(3):919-927. PubMed ID: 37940684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlations between whole body volumetric parameters of
Yildirim ÖA; Gündoğan C; Can C; Poyraz K; Erdur E; Kömek H
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 May; 35(5):540-548. PubMed ID: 33586097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlations of the
Karyagar SS; Karyagar S; Guven O
Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 32716402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can the Gleason score be predicted in patients with prostate cancer? A dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,
Akkaya H; Dilek O; Özdemir S; Taş ZA; Öztürk İS; Gülek B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 Sep; 29(5):647-655. PubMed ID: 37395389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
