These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38052019)

  • 1. Post Take-Over Performance Varies in Drivers of Automated and Connected Vehicle Technology in Near-Miss Scenarios.
    Yamani Y; Glassman J; Alruwaili A; Yahoodik SE; Davis E; Lugo S; Xie K; Ishak S
    Hum Factors; 2024 Nov; 66(11):2503-2517. PubMed ID: 38052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the connected vehicle environment on tunnel entrance zone.
    Li Z; Xing G; Zhao X; Li H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106145. PubMed ID: 34020757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents.
    Zieger S; Dong J; Taylor S; Sanford C; Jeon M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1129294. PubMed ID: 36998376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The driver's instantaneous situation awareness when the alarm rings during the take-over of vehicle control in automated driving.
    Niu J; Zhang Z; Sun Y; Wang X; Ni J; Qin H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):478-482. PubMed ID: 36170041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.
    Hungund AP; Kumar Pradhan A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107076. PubMed ID: 37150132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1961-1976. PubMed ID: 37490722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drivers' Performance in Non-critical Take-Overs From an Automated Driving System-An On-Road Study.
    Rydström A; Mullaart MS; Novakazi F; Johansson M; Eriksson A
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1841-1857. PubMed ID: 35212565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
    Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibration of Trust in Automated Driving: A Matter of Initial Level of Trust and Automated Driving Style?
    Manchon JB; Bueno M; Navarro J
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1613-1629. PubMed ID: 34861787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Drivers' Perceptions of Connected Vehicle-Human Machine Interface for Driving Under Adverse Weather Conditions: Preliminary Findings From Wyoming.
    Ahmed MM; Yang G; Gaweesh S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1889. PubMed ID: 33013502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A context-aware driver model for determining recommended speed in blind intersection situations.
    Saito Y; Sugaya F; Inoue S; Raksincharoensak P; Inoue H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106447. PubMed ID: 34673382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulator evaluation of an intersection maneuver assist system with connected and automated vehicle technologies.
    Pradhan AK; Pai G; Jeong H; Bao S
    Ergonomics; 2023 Jul; 66(7):999-1014. PubMed ID: 36062830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidance-oriented advanced curve speed warning system in a connected vehicle environment.
    Wang S; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105801. PubMed ID: 33128990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.