136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38052160)
1. Toward High-Performance Piezoresistive Polymer Derived SiOC Ceramics through Masked Stereolithography 3D Printing with β-Silicon Carbide Nanopowder Reinforcement.
Rahman MS; Phani A; Kim S
Macromol Rapid Commun; 2024 Mar; 45(5):e2300602. PubMed ID: 38052160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In Vitro Cytocompatibility Assessment of Ti-Modified, Silicon-oxycarbide-Based, Polymer-Derived, Ceramic-Implantable Electrodes under Pacing Conditions.
Vallachira Warriam Sasikumar P; Müller E; Clement P; Jang J; Kakkava E; Panusa G; Psaltis D; Maniura-Weber K; Rottmar M; Brugger J; Blugan G
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(15):17244-17253. PubMed ID: 32216331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stereolithography of SiOC Ceramic Microcomponents.
Zanchetta E; Cattaldo M; Franchin G; Schwentenwein M; Homa J; Brusatin G; Colombo P
Adv Mater; 2016 Jan; 28(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26545292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review.
Della Bona A; Cantelli V; Britto VT; Collares KF; Stansbury JW
Dent Mater; 2021 Feb; 37(2):336-350. PubMed ID: 33353734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced toughness and strength of 3D printed carbide-oxide composite for biomedical applications.
Das M; Dixit A; Jana A; Karthik R; Sreeram PR; Bora H; Dhara S; Panda SK; Tiwary CS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106290. PubMed ID: 38088010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical properties and wear behaviors analysis of fluorapatite glass-ceramics based on stereolithography 3D printing.
Yang B; Wang S; Wang G; Yang X
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104859. PubMed ID: 34607301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Printable PICN Composite Mechanically Compatible with Human Teeth.
Sodeyama MK; Ikeda H; Nagamatsu Y; Masaki C; Hosokawa R; Shimizu H
J Dent Res; 2021 Dec; 100(13):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 33978514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-Dimensional Printing of Ceramics through "Carving" a Gel and "Filling in" the Precursor Polymer.
Mahmoudi M; Wang C; Moreno S; Burlison SR; Alatalo D; Hassanipour F; Smith SE; Naraghi M; Minary-Jolandan M
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Jul; 12(28):31984-31991. PubMed ID: 32551471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-Resin Masked Stereolithography (MSLA) 3D Printing for Rapid and Inexpensive Prototyping of Microfluidic Chips with Integrated Functional Components.
Ahmed I; Sullivan K; Priye A
Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36005047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D printed bio-ceramic loaded PEGDA/vitreous carbon composite: Fabrication, characterization, and life cycle assessment.
Kumar M; Sharma V
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jul; 143():105904. PubMed ID: 37178637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Projection Stereolithography 3D-Printed Bio-Polymer with Thermal Assistance.
Pu H; Guo Y; Cheng Z; Chen Z; Xiong J; Zhu X; Huang J
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Nov; 15(22):. PubMed ID: 38006126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revealing Nanodomain Structures of Bottom-Up-Fabricated Graphene-Embedded Silicon Oxycarbide Ceramics.
Hu D; Shao G; Wang J; Gurlo A; Bekheet MF
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 36080751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Additive manufacturing of polymer-derived ceramics.
Eckel ZC; Zhou C; Martin JH; Jacobsen AJ; Carter WB; Schaedler TA
Science; 2016 Jan; 351(6268):58-62. PubMed ID: 26721993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and Manufacturing of Si-Based Non-Oxide Cellular Ceramic Structures through Indirect 3D Printing.
El Chawich G; El Hayek J; Rouessac V; Cot D; Rebière B; Habchi R; Garay H; Bechelany M; Zakhour M; Miele P; Salameh C
Materials (Basel); 2022 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 35057187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Piezoresistive Properties of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) Nanocomposites.
Hashemi Sanatgar R; Cayla A; Guan J; Chen G; Nierstrasz V; Campagne C
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jul; 14(15):. PubMed ID: 35893945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereolithography 3D printing technology in pharmaceuticals: a review.
Deshmane S; Kendre P; Mahajan H; Jain S
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1362-1372. PubMed ID: 34663145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personalized Baghdadite scaffolds: stereolithography, mechanics and in vivo testing.
Mirkhalaf M; Dao A; Schindeler A; Little DG; Dunstan CR; Zreiqat H
Acta Biomater; 2021 Sep; 132():217-226. PubMed ID: 33711527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of photopolymer resins for dental prosthetics fabricated via the stereolithography process at different polymerization temperatures. Part II: Dimensional accuracy and fracture load of fixed dental prostheses.
Lee JM; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):330.e1-330.e9. PubMed ID: 37993321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrochemical Performance of Polymer-Derived Silicon-Oxycarbide/Graphene Nanoplatelet Composites for High-Performance Li-Ion Batteries.
Jella G; Panda DK; Sapkota N; Greenough M; Datta SP; Rao AM; Sujith R; Bordia RK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Jun; 15(25):30039-30051. PubMed ID: 37309875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
