These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3805267)

  • 1. Pregnancy and employment leave: legal precedents and future policy.
    Gardin SK; Richwald GA
    J Public Health Policy; 1986; 7(4):458-69. PubMed ID: 3805267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What the Pregnancy Discrimination Act means for hospitals.
    Stickler KB
    Trustee; 1979 Nov; 32(11):15-9. PubMed ID: 10244446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dependents' pregnancy-related medical benefits and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
    Frankel GW
    Duke Law J; 1983 Feb; (1):134-52. PubMed ID: 10259899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Employee benefits: no abortion benefits, no contracts.
    Geisel J
    Mod Healthc; 1980 Feb; 10(2):30. PubMed ID: 10245551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Law may force slash in pregnancy benefits.
    Geisel J
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Dec; 9(12):28. PubMed ID: 503019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pregnancy disability amendment: what the law provides, part II.
    Trotter R; Zacur SR; Greenwood W
    Pers Adm; 1982 Mar; 27(3):55-6, 58. PubMed ID: 10254625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pregnancy disability amendment: what the law provides: part I.
    Trotter R; Zacur SR; Gatewood W
    Pers Adm; 1982 Feb; 27(2):47-8, 50-4. PubMed ID: 10254624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Update: new rights for pregnant employees.
    Lines PM
    Pers J; 1979 Jan; 58(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 10239889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A battle over birth "control": legal and legislative employer prescription contraception benefit mandates.
    Loomis CK
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 2002 Dec; 11(1):463-94. PubMed ID: 16389684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How federal discrimination laws affect health/welfare and pension benefit plans.
    Weiss FK
    Empl Benefits J; 1981 Mar; 6(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 10249983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mothers in the workforce.
    Glezer H
    Fam Matters; 1988 Aug; (21):30-4. PubMed ID: 12342043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pregnant worker: who bears the burden?
    Bunch PL; McFarlane DR; Dowben C
    Women Health; 1979; 4(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 532181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving return-to-work after childbirth: design of the Mom@Work study, a randomised controlled trial and cohort study.
    Stomp-van den Berg SG; van Poppel MN; Hendriksen IJ; Bruinvels DJ; Uegaki K; de Bruijne MC; van Mechelen W
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Mar; 7():43. PubMed ID: 17394629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex discrimination and insurance for contraception.
    Law SA
    Wash Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 73(2):363-402. PubMed ID: 12465638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ordinance No. 003/PRG/SGG/88 issuing the Labour Code, 28 January 1988.
    Guinea
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():99-100. PubMed ID: 12289746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legislation, women, and breastfeeding.
    Gibbons G
    MCH News PAC; 1987; 2(4):5, 11. PubMed ID: 12281642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. General Labour Code (Act No. 2 of 1986), 5 April 1986. [Selected provisions].
    Guinea-Bissau
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():86, 481-2. PubMed ID: 12344565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Employe must complain to EEOC before feds force abortion payment.
    Geisel J
    Mod Healthc; 1980 Mar; 10(3):34. PubMed ID: 10245570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra, 13 January 1987.
    United States. Supreme Court
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():97-8. PubMed ID: 12346800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.