These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38052671)
1. Reinterpretation of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Imaging Exams: Assessment of Clinical Impact, Peer Learning, and Physician Satisfaction. Photopoulos GS; Wilson DS; Clarke SE; Costa AF Acad Radiol; 2024 May; 31(5):1870-1877. PubMed ID: 38052671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and Value of Subspecialty Reinterpretation of Thoracic CT Scans of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cancer Center. Carter BW; Erasmus JJ; Truong MT; Shepard JO; Hofstetter W; Clarke R; Munden RF; Steele JR J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1109-1118. PubMed ID: 28434844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. JOURNAL CLUB: Hepatopancreaticobiliary Imaging Second-Opinion Consultations: Is There Value in the Second Reading? Shetty AS; Mittal A; Salter A; Narra VR; Fowler KJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1264-1272. PubMed ID: 30247982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiology E-Consults: Reinterpretation of Outside CT and MRI Exams to Improve Quality, Reduce Unneeded Imaging, and Lower Costs. Cameron SF; Schwartz RK Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2024; 53(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 37722979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of official reinterpretation of trauma computed tomography scans from referring hospitals. Onwubiko C; Mooney DP J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Mar; 51(3):486-9. PubMed ID: 26342629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Impact of Second Opinion Radiology Consultation for Patients With Breast Cancer. Whorms DS; Giess CS; Golshan M; Freedman RA; Bunnell CA; Alper EC; Losk K; Khorasani R J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jun; 16(6):814-823. PubMed ID: 30579707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT studies by subspecialty experts in stroke imaging. Jordan YJ; Jordan JE; Lightfoote JB; Ragland KD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 23169731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial Referring Physician and Radiologist Experience with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System. Bunch PM; Meegalla NT; Abualruz AR; Frizzell BA; Patwa HS; Porosnicu M; Williams DW; Aiken AH; Hughes RT Laryngoscope; 2022 Feb; 132(2):349-355. PubMed ID: 34272871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications. Eakins C; Ellis WD; Pruthi S; Johnson DP; Hernanz-Schulman M; Yu C; Kan JH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):916-20. PubMed ID: 22997387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A picture is worth a thousand words: needs assessment for multimedia radiology reports in a large tertiary care medical center. Nayak L; Beaulieu CF; Rubin DL; Lipson JA Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1577-83. PubMed ID: 24200485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers. Bassett LW; Bomyea K; Liu S; Sayre J Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):235-8. PubMed ID: 7892477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of outside radiologists' reports of computed tomography exams of emergently transferred patients. Robinson JD; Linnau KF; Hippe DS; Sheehan KL; Gross JA Emerg Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 29282579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volume and impact of second-opinion consultations by radiologists at a tertiary care cancer center: data. DiPiro PJ; vanSonnenberg E; Tumeh SS; Ros PR Acad Radiol; 2002 Dec; 9(12):1430-3. PubMed ID: 12553355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adding value to imaging services: a survey of patient and referring physician preferences for direct radiologic reporting of results. Thai JN; Josemon R; Smith S; Morey J; Sison CP; Landau E; Chaya N; Peti S; Jbara ME; Sarkany D; Raden M; Brenner AI Clin Imaging; 2021 May; 73():73-78. PubMed ID: 33316709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations for additional imaging of abdominal imaging examinations: frequency, benefit, and cost. Heinz SA; Kwee TC; Yakar D Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 31451972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. JOURNAL CLUB: Informal Consultations Between Radiologists and Referring Physicians, as Identified Through an Electronic Medical Record Search. Won E; Rosenkrantz AB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):965-969. PubMed ID: 28726504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Second-Opinion Subspecialty Consultations in Musculoskeletal Radiology. Chalian M; Del Grande F; Thakkar RS; Jalali SF; Chhabra A; Carrino JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1217-21. PubMed ID: 27058462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reinterpretation of Outside Hospital MRI Abdomen Examinations in Patients With Cirrhosis: Is the OPTN Mandate Necessary? Rahman WT; Hussain HK; Parikh ND; Davenport MS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Oct; 207(4):782-788. PubMed ID: 27440522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of Radiology Reports for Intensive Care Unit Portable Chest Radiographs: Perceptions and Preferences of Radiologists and ICU Practitioners. Mortani Barbosa EJ; Lynch MC; Langlotz CP; Gefter WB J Thorac Imaging; 2016 Jan; 31(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26258599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Second-Opinion Interpretations of Gynecologic Oncologic MRI Examinations by Sub-Specialized Radiologists Influence Patient Care. Lakhman Y; D'Anastasi M; Miccò M; Scelzo C; Vargas HA; Nougaret S; Sosa RE; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2089-98. PubMed ID: 26494640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]