These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38052992)

  • 21. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws.
    Deng K; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104279. PubMed ID: 36070825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An
    Kaur T; Singla S; Kumar L
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36588371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Need for a reliable alternative to custom-made Implant Impression trays: An
    Goel M; Dhawan P; Tandan P; Madhukar P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(3):271-276. PubMed ID: 30111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.
    Mata-Mata SJ; Donmez MB; Meirelles L; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):821-830. PubMed ID: 36196856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative evaluation of open tray impression technique: investigating the precision of four splinting materials in multiple implants.
    Patil P; Madhav VNV; Alshadidi AAF; Saini RS; Aldosari LIN; Heboyan A; Mosaddad SA; Bin Hassan SA; Chaturvedi S
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):844. PubMed ID: 37940890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY; Cader FN; Abduo J; Palamara J
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative analysis of the selective pressure impression technique using CAD-CAM technology: A pilot clinical study.
    Stein BE; Yoon HI; Mattie H; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1289-1294. PubMed ID: 33992466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques.
    Alsharbaty MHM; Alikhasi M; Zarrati S; Shamshiri AR
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e902-e908. PubMed ID: 29423969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of impression material accuracy in complete-arch restorations on four implants.
    Baldissara P; Koci B; Messias AM; Meneghello R; Ghelli F; Gatto MR; Ciocca L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):763-771. PubMed ID: 33526247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions-An In Vitro Study.
    Ribeiro P; Herrero-Climent M; Díaz-Castro C; Ríos-Santos JV; Padrós R; Mur JG; Falcão C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 30060540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.