BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38054395)

  • 21. Incidence of undetected cement on CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia crowns and customized CAD/CAM implant abutments. A prospective case series.
    Wasiluk G; Chomik E; Gehrke P; Pietruska M; Skurska A; Pietruski J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):774-778. PubMed ID: 27188407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A modified technique for preventing excess cement around implant supported restoration margins.
    Rayyan MM; Makarem HA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):840-842. PubMed ID: 27460328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A technique for repairing a loosening abutment screw for a cement-retained implant prosthesis.
    Patil PG
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Dec; 20(8):652-5. PubMed ID: 21883632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selection of 1-mm venting or 2.5-mm screw access holes on implant crowns based on cement extrusion and retention capacity.
    Zhou H; Ye S; Liu M; Feng H; Wen C
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):108. PubMed ID: 35366875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cement flow in abutment margin-crown platform switching].
    Ou ME; Ding Y; Tang WF; Zhou YS
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Jun; 55(3):548-552. PubMed ID: 37291933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in vitro investigation comparing methods of minimizing excess luting agent for cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Bukhari SA; AlHelal A; Kattadiyil MT; Wadhwani CPK; Taleb A; Dehom S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):706-715. PubMed ID: 31987589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study.
    Linkevicius T; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L; Maslova N; Puriene A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22487018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual-space technique for creating cement space in a cementation device for implant dentistry: A predictable chairside approach.
    Esquivel J; Piñeyro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 31753455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using Er:YAG laser to remove lithium disilicate crowns from zirconia implant abutments: An in vitro study.
    Deeb JG; Bencharit S; Dalal N; Abdulmajeed A; Grzech-Leśniak K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223924. PubMed ID: 31689289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A technique to eliminate subgingival cement adhesion to implant abutments by using polytetrafluoroethylene tape.
    Hess TA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 24529837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Cement Removal From Implant-Retained Crowns Using a Proposed "Circular Crisscross" Flossing Technique.
    Ferreira CF; Shafter M; Jain V; Wicks RA; Linder E; da Silva Ledo CA
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Jun; 44(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 29436969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crestal bone loss and the consequences of retained excess cement around dental implants.
    Shapoff CA; Lahey BJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Feb; 33(2):94-6, 98-101; quiz 102, 112. PubMed ID: 22545427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative in vitro study of cementing techniques for implant-supported restorations.
    Liang T; Hu X; Zhu L; Pan X; Zhou Y; Liu J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26946915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peri-implant disease caused by residual cement around implant-supported restorations: a clinical report.
    Scarano A; Inchingolo F; Scogna S; Leo L; Greco Lucchina A; Mavriqi L
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(2 Suppl. 1):211-216. PubMed ID: 34281319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of different cementation techniques on retained excess cement and uniaxial retention of the implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Begum Z; Sonika R; Pratik C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1333-7. PubMed ID: 25153002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of crown venting or pre-cementing of CAD/CAM-constructed all-ceramic crowns luted on YTZ implants on marginal cement excess.
    Zaugg LK; Zehnder I; Rohr N; Fischer J; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29044723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of Luting Materials and Methods and the Restoration Surface on the Amount of Cement Remnants in Implant Restorations.
    Lee JH; Yang SE; Lee J; Lee SY
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Aug; 45(4):301-307. PubMed ID: 31008680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing effectiveness of rubber dam and gingival displacement cord with copy abutment in reducing residual cement in cement-retained implant crowns: A crossover RCT.
    Andrijauskas P; Zukauskas S; Alkimavicius J; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):549-558. PubMed ID: 33595848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of abutment neck taper and cement types on the amount of remnant cement in cement-retained implant restorations: an
    Park YH; Kim KA; Lee JJ; Kwon TM; Seo JM
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 14(3):162-172. PubMed ID: 35855317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease - a systematic review.
    Staubli N; Walter C; Schmidt JC; Weiger R; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1278-1290. PubMed ID: 27647536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.