These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38054483)

  • 1. Current Challenges and Controversies in Colorectal Carcinoma Pathologic Staging-A Practical Guide.
    Clark I; Mehreen A; Dickson PV; Shibata D; Glazer ES; Choudhury N; Jain R
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 38054483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TNM staging of colorectal carcinoma: issues and caveats.
    Shia J; Klimstra DS; Bagci P; Basturk O; Adsay NV
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):142-53. PubMed ID: 23062421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Key issues in reporting common cancer specimens: problems in pathologic staging of colon cancer.
    Compton CC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 16519558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controversies in the pathological assessment of colorectal cancer.
    Maguire A; Sheahan K
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 20(29):9850-61. PubMed ID: 25110416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current dilemmas in the pathological staging of colorectal cancer: the results of a national survey.
    Wong NACS; Bracey TS; Mozayani B; Bateman AC; Novelli MR; Shepherd NA
    Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):634-639. PubMed ID: 33001486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact on colorectal cancer pathology reporting practice of migration from TNM 5 to TNM 8.
    Loughrey MB; Kent O; Moore M; Coghlin C; Kelly P; McVeigh G; Coleman HG
    Histopathology; 2020 Aug; 77(2):210-222. PubMed ID: 32285464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.
    Compton CC; Fielding LP; Burgart LJ; Conley B; Cooper HS; Hamilton SR; Hammond ME; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Nagle RB; Nielsen ML; Sargent DJ; Taylor CR; Welton M; Willett C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Jul; 124(7):979-94. PubMed ID: 10888773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colorectal cancer staging using TNM 7: is it time to use this new staging system?
    Doyle VJ; Bateman AC
    J Clin Pathol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):372-4. PubMed ID: 22228905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues.
    Puppa G; Sonzogni A; Colombari R; Pelosi G
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jun; 134(6):837-52. PubMed ID: 20524862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists.
    Compton CC; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Sobin LH; Bowman HE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 9431313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of TNM staging in colorectal cancer: a review of current culprits, the modern role of morphology and stepping-stones for improvements in the molecular era.
    Lea D; Håland S; Hagland HR; Søreide K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):1153-63. PubMed ID: 25144865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Review of Current Challenges in Colorectal Cancer Reporting.
    Dawson H; Kirsch R; Messenger D; Driman D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Jul; 143(7):869-882. PubMed ID: 30672337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colorectal carcinoma: selected issues in pathologic examination and staging and determination of prognostic factors.
    Washington MK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 132(10):1600-7. PubMed ID: 18834218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges with colorectal cancer staging: results of an international study.
    Karamchandani DM; Chetty R; King TS; Liu X; Westerhoff M; Yang Z; Yantiss RK; Driman DK
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 31383959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mistakes on EUS staging of colorectal carcinoma: error in interpretation or deception from innate pathologic features?
    McClave SA; Jones WF; Woolfolk GM; Schrodt GR; Wiersema MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Jun; 51(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 10840300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Persistent Problems in Colorectal Cancer Reporting.
    Yantiss RK
    Surg Pathol Clin; 2017 Dec; 10(4):961-976. PubMed ID: 29103542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma.
    Jass JR; O'Brien MJ; Riddell RH; Snover DC;
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Apr; 38(4):537-545. PubMed ID: 17270246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serosal surfaces, mucin pools, and deposits, oh my: challenges in staging colorectal carcinoma.
    Frankel WL; Jin M
    Mod Pathol; 2015 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S95-108. PubMed ID: 25560604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice.
    Urbanowicz M; Grabsch HI; Fiteni F; Liu Y; Caballero C; Fléjou JF
    Virchows Arch; 2018 Dec; 473(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 30255341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction.
    Burke HB; Goodman PH; Rosen DB; Henson DE; Weinstein JN; Harrell FE; Marks JR; Winchester DP; Bostwick DG
    Cancer; 1997 Feb; 79(4):857-62. PubMed ID: 9024725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.