BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38058028)

  • 1. Comparing pain intensity rating scales in acute postoperative pain: boundary values and category disagreements.
    Moore RA; Clephas PRD; Straube S; Wertli MM; Ireson-Paige J; Heesen M
    Anaesthesia; 2024 Feb; 79(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 38058028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cut-off points between pain intensities of the postoperative pain using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
    Cho S; Kim YJ; Lee M; Woo JH; Lee HJ
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33494704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
    Boonstra AM; Schiphorst Preuper HR; Balk GA; Stewart RE
    Pain; 2014 Dec; 155(12):2545-2550. PubMed ID: 25239073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating postherniorrhaphy groin pain: Visual Analogue or Verbal Rating Scale?
    Loos MJ; Houterman S; Scheltinga MR; Roumen RM
    Hernia; 2008 Apr; 12(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 18004502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The level of agreement between the numerical rating scale and visual analogue scale for assessing pain intensity in adults with chronic pain.
    Goudman L; Pilitsis JG; Billet B; De Vos R; Hanssens K; Billot M; Roulaud M; Rigoard P; Moens M
    Anaesthesia; 2024 Feb; 79(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 38058100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups.
    Lund I; Lundeberg T; Sandberg L; Budh CN; Kowalski J; Svensson E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():31. PubMed ID: 16202149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of verbal rating scale and numerical rating scale to assess postoperative pain intensity in the post anesthesia care unit: A prospective observational cohort study.
    Lee HJ; Cho Y; Joo H; Jeon JY; Jang YE; Kim JT
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Feb; 100(6):e24314. PubMed ID: 33578527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining numerical cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain in adult burn survivors: A northwest regional burn model system investigation.
    Carrougher GJ; Bamer AM; Mason S; Stewart BT; Gibran NS
    Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):310-316. PubMed ID: 36566097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?
    Collins SL; Moore RA; McQuay HJ
    Pain; 1997 Aug; 72(1-2):95-7. PubMed ID: 9272792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients.
    Briggs M; Closs JS
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 1999 Dec; 18(6):438-46. PubMed ID: 10641470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.
    Hjermstad MJ; Fayers PM; Haugen DF; Caraceni A; Hanks GW; Loge JH; Fainsinger R; Aass N; Kaasa S;
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2011 Jun; 41(6):1073-93. PubMed ID: 21621130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pain measurement: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) in clinical trials with OTC analgesics in headache.
    Aicher B; Peil H; Peil B; Diener HC
    Cephalalgia; 2012 Feb; 32(3):185-97. PubMed ID: 22332207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain.
    Baños JE; Bosch F; Cañellas M; Bassols A; Ortega F; Bigorra J
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1989 Feb; 11(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 2709918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Agreement between verbal numerical scale and visual analog scale assessments in monitoring acute postoperative pain].
    Díez Burón F; Marcos Vidal JM; Baticón Escudero PM; Montes Armenteros A; Bermejo López JC; Merino Garcia M
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2011 May; 58(5):279-82. PubMed ID: 21688506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the Intensity of Chronic Pain: Are the Visual Analogue Scale and the Verbal Rating Scale Interchangeable?
    Kliger M; Stahl S; Haddad M; Suzan E; Adler R; Eisenberg E
    Pain Pract; 2015 Jul; 15(6):538-47. PubMed ID: 24735056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.
    Li L; Liu X; Herr K
    Pain Med; 2007 Apr; 8(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 17371409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients' self-reported nausea: Validation of the Numerical Rating Scale and of a daily summary of repeated Numerical Rating Scale scores.
    Wikström L; Nilsson M; Broström A; Eriksson K
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Mar; 28(5-6):959-968. PubMed ID: 30357970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the VAS for children and adolescents: what can be learned from 10 million ANOVAs?
    Hirschfeld G; Zernikow B
    Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2626-2632. PubMed ID: 23742796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analgesia Nociception Index: assessment of acute postoperative pain].
    Abdullayev R; Uludag O; Celik B
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2019; 69(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 31399197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative prospective evaluation of the responsiveness of single-item pediatric pain-intensity self-report scales and their uniqueness from negative affect in a hospital setting.
    Connelly M; Neville K
    J Pain; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1451-60. PubMed ID: 20646966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.