127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38058100)
1. The level of agreement between the numerical rating scale and visual analogue scale for assessing pain intensity in adults with chronic pain.
Goudman L; Pilitsis JG; Billet B; De Vos R; Hanssens K; Billot M; Roulaud M; Rigoard P; Moens M
Anaesthesia; 2024 Feb; 79(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 38058100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the Intensity of Chronic Pain: Are the Visual Analogue Scale and the Verbal Rating Scale Interchangeable?
Kliger M; Stahl S; Haddad M; Suzan E; Adler R; Eisenberg E
Pain Pract; 2015 Jul; 15(6):538-47. PubMed ID: 24735056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An observational study of agreement between percentage pain reduction calculated from visual analog or numerical rating scales versus that reported by parturients during labor epidural analgesia.
Pratici E; Nebout S; Merbai N; Filippova J; Hajage D; Keita H
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2017 May; 30():39-43. PubMed ID: 28284462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Hausa Versions of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Global Rating of Change Scale in a Low-literate Population With Chronic Low Back Pain.
Ibrahim AA; Akindele MO; Bello B; Kaka B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E439-E447. PubMed ID: 31658233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlations among algometry, the visual analogue scale, and the numeric rating scale to assess chronic pelvic pain in women.
Alfonsin MM; Chapon R; de Souza CAB; Genro VK; Mattia MMC; Cunha-Filho JS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2019 Jul; 3():100037. PubMed ID: 31403125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups.
Lund I; Lundeberg T; Sandberg L; Budh CN; Kowalski J; Svensson E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():31. PubMed ID: 16202149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing pain intensity in children with chronic pain: convergent and discriminant validity of the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale in clinical practice.
Ruskin D; Lalloo C; Amaria K; Stinson JN; Kewley E; Campbell F; Brown SC; Jeavons M; McGrath PA
Pain Res Manag; 2014; 19(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 24712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring pain intensity in older adults. Can the visual analogue scale and the numeric rating scale be used interchangeably?
Bjelkarøy MT; Benth JŠ; Simonsen TB; Siddiqui TG; Cheng S; Kristoffersen ES; Lundqvist C
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2024 Mar; 130():110925. PubMed ID: 38143014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain.
Euasobhon P; Atisook R; Bumrungchatudom K; Zinboonyahgoon N; Saisavoey N; Jensen MP
Pain; 2022 Dec; 163(12):e1184-e1191. PubMed ID: 35584261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Assessment of Acute Pain in Pre-Hospital Care Using Verbal Numerical Rating and Visual Analogue Scales.
Ismail AK; Abdul Ghafar MA; Shamsuddin NS; Roslan NA; Kaharuddin H; Nik Muhamad NA
J Emerg Med; 2015 Sep; 49(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 26022936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing pain intensity rating scales in acute postoperative pain: boundary values and category disagreements.
Moore RA; Clephas PRD; Straube S; Wertli MM; Ireson-Paige J; Heesen M
Anaesthesia; 2024 Feb; 79(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 38058028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Good correlation between visual analogue scale and numerical rating scale in the assessment of nasal obstruction.
Haye R; Døsen LK; Tarangen M; Shiryaeva O
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Apr; 132(4):327-328. PubMed ID: 29444717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients.
Lee JJ; Lee MK; Kim JE; Kim HZ; Park SH; Tae JH; Choi SS
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(2):E195-200. PubMed ID: 25794219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of four self-report scales of pain intensity in 6- to 8-year-old children.
Sánchez-Rodríguez E; Miró J; Castarlenas E
Pain; 2012 Aug; 153(8):1715-1719. PubMed ID: 22703691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The visual time analog scale: simple, novel measurement approach to assess pain in patients with chronic pain.
Okifuji A; Mitsunaga R; Kida Y; Donaldson GW
Pain Manag; 2021 Apr; 11(4):357-368. PubMed ID: 33583225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The end of the line? The Visual Analogue Scale and Verbal Numerical Rating Scale as pain assessment tools in the emergency department.
Mohan H; Ryan J; Whelan B; Wakai A
Emerg Med J; 2010 May; 27(5):372-5. PubMed ID: 20442167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Visual Analogue Scale Versus Numerical Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Severity and Predicting Disability in Low Back Pain.
Shafshak TS; Elnemr R
J Clin Rheumatol; 2021 Oct; 27(7):282-285. PubMed ID: 31985722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?
Thong ISK; Jensen MP; Miró J; Tan G
Scand J Pain; 2018 Jan; 18(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 29794282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of the Visual Analogue Scale for the assessment of labour pain: a systematic review.
Wei CK; Leng CY; Siew Lin SK
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2010; 8(24):972-1015. PubMed ID: 27820205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain.
Alghadir AH; Anwer S; Iqbal ZA
Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 38(24):2392-7. PubMed ID: 26733318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
