152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38058665)
1. Conventional versus Liquid-based Cytology: "Man versus Machine".
Pathuthara S; Dighe S; Uke M; Prabhudesai N; Deodhar K; Desai SB
J Cytol; 2023; 40(4):169-176. PubMed ID: 38058665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears.
Mahajan S; Rajwanshi A; Srinivasan R; Radotra BD; Panda N
J Cytol; 2021; 38(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 35002112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology in fine-needle aspirates of salivary gland neoplasms.
Kumar M; Katiyar S; Sagar M; Kumari M; Goel MM
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2018; 61(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 29567883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liquid-based versus conventional cytology in solid pediatric neoplasm: Comparison of their diagnostic and morphological spectra.
Agarwal P; Yadav S; Kumar A; Goel MM
J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 28028334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology in Adequacy of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies without an Accompanying Cytopathologist.
Sayer AO; Mut DT; Bodelschwingh BV; Ozguven BY; Sahin C
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul; 2022; 56(3):353-359. PubMed ID: 36304222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guided Needle Aspirations of Intra-Abdominal Masses: Analogy between Liquid-Based and Conventional Smear Preparation Methods.
Agrahari R; Agarwal P; Bhalla S; Anand A; Akhtar N; Parihar A; Sonkar AA; Goel MM
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 35249007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fine needle aspiration cytology of cervical lymph nodes: Comparison of liquid based cytology (SurePath) and conventional preparation.
Budhwar A; Kataria SP; Kumar S; Singh G; Kaushik N; Sen R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jan; 49(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 32841545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of manual liquid-based cytology and conventional smears in the evaluation of various fine-needle aspiration samples.
Arul P
J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):177-181. PubMed ID: 28028330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Analysis of Conventional Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology in the Detection of Carcinoma Cervix and its Precursor Lesions.
Maheshwari Y; Handa U; Aggarwal P; Goel B
J Cytol; 2023; 40(3):114-118. PubMed ID: 37745808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of conventional and liquid-based cytology in a colposcopic setting.
Hussein T; Desai M; Tomlinson A; Kitchener HC
BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1542-6. PubMed ID: 16225576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of cytomorphology of thyroid lesion on conventional cytology versus liquid-based cytology and categorize the lesions according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.
Alam MQ; Pandey P; Ralli M; Singh Chauhan JP; Aggarwal R; Chaturvedi V; Kapoor A; Trivedi K; Agarwal S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022 Dec; 18(Supplement):S259-S266. PubMed ID: 36510974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chandan S; Mohan BP; Khan SR; Ofosu A; Dhaliwal AS; Shah AR; Bhogal N; Mashiana HS; Mashiana SS; Kassab LL; Ponnada S; Facciorusso A; Bhat I; Singh S; Witt BL; Adler DG
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):E1611-E1622. PubMed ID: 33140017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic utility of conventional and liquid-based cytology in the management of thyroid lesions; an institutional experience.
Sharma R; Zaheer S; Ahluwalia C
Cytojournal; 2022; 19():36. PubMed ID: 35928535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Analysis of Liquid based and Conventional Cytology Smears in Fine Needle Aspirates from Breast Lesions.
Sharma V; Gupta V; Parmar P; Jain P; Thakran D; Sen R
J Cytol; 2019; 36(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 30992643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic yield and agreement on fine-needle specimens from solid pancreatic lesions : comparing the smear technique to liquid-based cytology.
van Riet PA; Quispel R; Cahen DL; Snijders-Kruisbergen MC; van Loenen P; Erler NS; Poley JW; van Driel LMJW; Mulder SA; Veldt BJ; Leeuwenburgh I; Anten MGF; Honkoop P; Thijssen AY; Hol L; Hadithi M; Fitzpatrick CE; Schot I; Bergmann JF; Bhalla A; Bruno MJ; Biermann K
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Feb; 8(2):E155-E162. PubMed ID: 32010748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Samples from Conventional Smear versus Liquid-Based Cytology in Uterine Cervical Cancer Screening Test.
Jeong H; Hong SR; Chae SW; Jin SY; Yoon HK; Lee J; Kim EK; Ha ST; Kim SN; Park EJ; Jung JJ; Sung SH; Lim SC
J Pathol Transl Med; 2017 May; 51(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 28415159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional smear cytology for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective randomized noninferiority study.
Chun JW; Lee K; Lee SH; Kim H; You MS; Hwang YJ; Paik WH; Ryu JK; Kim YT
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Apr; 91(4):837-846.e1. PubMed ID: 31759036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized noninferiority trial comparing conventional smears and SurePathTM liquid-based cytology in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of esophageal, gastric, and duodenal lesions.
Jun JC; Lee SH; Lee HM; Kim SG; Chung H; Kim JS; Park N; Choi JH; Kwak Y; Cho SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jul; 102(29):e34321. PubMed ID: 37478273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study of cellular counting to determine minimum thresholds for adequacy for liquid-based cervical cytology using a survey and counting protocol.
Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Desai M; Smith JH; Cook G; Roberts C; Turnbull L
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Mar; 19(22):i-xix, 1-64. PubMed ID: 25774649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liquid-based cytology in fine-needle aspiration of breast lesions: a review.
Gerhard R; Schmitt FC
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(6):533-42. PubMed ID: 25115652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
