These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3805974)

  • 21. Cooperative responding in rats maintained by fixed- and variable-ratio schedules.
    de Carvalho LC; Dos Santos L; Regaço A; Barbosa TB; da Silva RF; de Souza DDG; Sandaker I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jul; 110(1):105-126. PubMed ID: 29959779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interaction of procedural factors in human performance on yoked schedules.
    Raia CP; Shillingford SW; Miller HL; Baier PS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Nov; 74(3):265-81. PubMed ID: 11218225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments.
    Reed P
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 8035700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modeling bout-pause response patterns in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules using hierarchical Bayesian methodology.
    Matsui H; Yamada K; Sakagami T; Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():346-353. PubMed ID: 30059765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feeding patterns and operant responding by wild and domesticated rats in self-maintenance conditions.
    Shepherd DS
    Behav Brain Res; 1986 Jan; 19(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 3954870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Schedule-induced defecation.
    Rayfield F; Segal M; Goldiamond I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jul; 38(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 7202038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modeling VI and VDRL feedback functions: Searching normative rules through computational simulation.
    Silveira PSP; de Oliveira Siqueira J; Bernardy JL; Santiago J; Meneses TC; Portela BS; Benvenuti MF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Mar; 119(2):324-336. PubMed ID: 36733190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Schedule discrimination in a mixed schedule: implications for models of the variable-ratio, variable-interval rate difference.
    Silberberg A; Goto K; Hachiga Y; Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 18178339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.
    Galbicka G; Platt JR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 3772301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple determinants of transfer of evaluative function after conditioning with free-operant schedules of reinforcement.
    Dack C; Reed P; McHugh L
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):348-66. PubMed ID: 21048226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Human performance on random interval schedules.
    Reed P; Smale D; Owens D; Freegard G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):309-321. PubMed ID: 29985046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human instrumental performance in ratio and interval contingencies: A challenge for associative theory.
    Pérez OD; Aitken MR; Zhukovsky P; Soto FA; Urcelay GP; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 27894212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of induction in operant schedule performance.
    Baum WM
    Behav Processes; 2015 May; 114():26-33. PubMed ID: 25596517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of modeling versus instructions on sensitivity to reinforcement schedules.
    Neef NA; Marckel J; Ferreri S; Jung S; Nist L; Armstrong N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 15529886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Concurrent performances: reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys.
    Iglauer C; Woods JH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jul; 22(1):179-96. PubMed ID: 4455758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.
    Pliskoff SS; Shull RL; Gollub LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 5660708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Matching by horses on several concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Dougherty DM; Lewis P
    Behav Processes; 1992; 26(2-3):69-76. PubMed ID: 24924318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ratio and time requirements on operant schedules: effort-related effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions.
    Mingote S; Weber SM; Ishiwari K; Correa M; Salamone JD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 21(6):1749-57. PubMed ID: 15845103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variable-interval reinforcement schedule value influences responding following REM sleep deprivation.
    Kirby M; Kennedy CH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 14674732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.