These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38059959)

  • 1. Predictive and incremental validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and STABLE-2007 for sexual recidivism: A diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA).
    Holper L; Cerullo E; Mokros A; Habermeyer E
    Psychol Assess; 2024 Feb; 36(2):134-146. PubMed ID: 38059959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive accuracy of Static-99R across different racial/ethnic groups: A meta-analysis.
    Ahmed S; Lee SC; Helmus LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):275-291. PubMed ID: 36931863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis.
    Helmus LM; Hanson RK; Murrie DC; Zabarauckas CL
    Psychol Assess; 2021 Jul; 33(7):581-595. PubMed ID: 34014750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive Validity of Static-99R Among 8,207 Men Convicted of Sexual Crimes in South Korea: A Prospective Field Study.
    Lee SC; Hanson RK; Yoon JS
    Sex Abuse; 2023 Sep; 35(6):687-715. PubMed ID: 36394612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
    Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
    Reeves SG; Ogloff JRP; Simmons M
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Dec; 30(8):887-907. PubMed ID: 28597720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-Cultural Validity of Sexual Recidivism Risk Assessments Using Static-99R, STABLE-2007, and the VRS-SO.
    Helmus LM; Ahmed S; Lee SC; Olver ME
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2024 Feb; 26(2):27-36. PubMed ID: 38206456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive Validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland.
    Gonçalves LC; Gerth J; Rossegger A; Noll T; Endrass J
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Mar; 32(2):203-219. PubMed ID: 30623752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. STABLE-2007 Demonstrates Predictive and Incremental Validity in Assessing Risk-Relevant Propensities for Sexual Offending: A Meta-Analysis.
    Brankley AE; Babchishin KM; Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Feb; 33(1):34-62. PubMed ID: 31516097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive Validity of Tools for Assessing Recidivism Risk in Men Convicted of Sex Offending: Static-99R, Static-2002R and BARR-2002R.
    Ducro C; Pham TH
    Sex Abuse; 2024 Oct; ():10790632241290506. PubMed ID: 39412287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updated 5-year and new 10-year sexual recidivism rate norms for Static-99R with routine/complete samples.
    Lee SC; Hanson RK
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 33734747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Preliminary Analysis of Sexual Recidivism and Predictive Validity of the Static-99R in Men Discharged From State Hospitals Pursuant to California's Sexually Violent Predator Act.
    Azizian A; Olver ME; Rokop J; D'Orazio DM
    Sex Abuse; 2022 Apr; 34(3):319-340. PubMed ID: 34154482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R With Latino Sex Offenders.
    Leguízamo A; Lee SC; Jeglic EL; Calkins C
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Dec; 29(8):765-785. PubMed ID: 26680251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Exploratory Study of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments for Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses in Singapore.
    Tsao IT; Chu CM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Mar; 33(2):157-175. PubMed ID: 31674276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long Term Recidivism Rates Among Individuals at High Risk to Sexually Reoffend.
    Hanson RK; Lee SC; Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2024 Feb; 36(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 36382622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2015 Static-99R: Alternative Recidivism Tables for High-Risk Offenders.
    Elwood RW; Kelley SM; Mundt JC
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Oct; 61(14):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 26758206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).
    Walters GD; Deming A; Casbon T
    Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25013121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores?
    Hanson RK; Thornton D; Helmus LM; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):218-52. PubMed ID: 25810478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the Static-99R as a Global Screen for Risk of Sex Crime Recidivism in a Norwegian Routine Sample.
    Sandbukt IJ; Skardhamar T; Kristoffersen R; Friestad C
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):725-742. PubMed ID: 32830607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.