These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38059966)
1. When detecting a salient target makes search more effortful. Lee DS; Clement A; Anderson BA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Mar; 153(3):590-607. PubMed ID: 38059966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture. Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 36207666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes. Berry JH Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual search under physical effort is faster but more vulnerable to distractor interference. Park HB; Ahn S; Zhang W Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):17. PubMed ID: 33710497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Lamy D; Egeth HE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ignoring the unknown: Attentional suppression of unpredictable visual distraction. Ma X; Abrams RA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36227324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search. Berggren N; Eimer M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task. Wienrich C; Janczyk M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference. Barras C; Kerzel D Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional suppression in time and space. Xu Z; Los SA; Theeuwes J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 34516212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effortfulness of visual working memory: Gauged by physical exertion. Xie W; Zhang W J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jul; 152(7):2074-2093. PubMed ID: 36951745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search. Lamy D; Carmel T; Egeth HE; Leber AB Percept Psychophys; 2006 Aug; 68(6):919-32. PubMed ID: 17153188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of search mode on dimension weighting. Kumada T Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1054. PubMed ID: 25339919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Searching for Visual Singletons Without A Feature to Guide Attention. Tay D; McIntyre DL; McDonald JJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 34(11):2127-2143. PubMed ID: 35802599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transition from feature-search to singleton-detection strategies in visual search: The role of number of target-defining options. Lagroix HEP; Yanko MR; Spalek TM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):387-397. PubMed ID: 28816477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]