These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38061188)
21. Life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management: a case study from Ahvaz, Iran. Zarea MA; Moazed H; Ahmadmoazzam M; Malekghasemi S; Jaafarzadeh N Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Feb; 191(3):131. PubMed ID: 30725189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Areas on which to focus when seeking to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of commercial waste management. A case study of a hypermarket, Finland. Hupponen M; Grönman K; Horttanainen M Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():1-18. PubMed ID: 29576513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia. Malakahmad A; Abualqumboz MS; Kutty SRM; Abunama TJ Waste Manag; 2017 Dec; 70():282-292. PubMed ID: 28935377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Carbon footprint associated with four disposal scenarios for urban pruning waste. Araújo YRV; de Góis ML; Junior LMC; Carvalho M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(2):1863-1868. PubMed ID: 29103114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between landfill gas and waste incineration for power generation in Astana, Kazakhstan. Inglezakis VJ; Rojas-Solórzano L; Kim J; Aitbekova A; Ismailova A Waste Manag Res; 2015 May; 33(5):486-94. PubMed ID: 25819927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures. Yang N; Zhang H; Shao LM; Lü F; He PJ J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():510-21. PubMed ID: 24018116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pomace waste management scenarios in Québec--impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Gassara F; Brar SK; Pelletier F; Verma M; Godbout S; Tyagi RD J Hazard Mater; 2011 Sep; 192(3):1178-85. PubMed ID: 21733627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comprehensive assessment of food waste treatment emission reduction in China: a life cycle perspective. Liu T; Liu H; Wei G; Zhao H; Gong Y; Guo X; Zhang Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(37):87669-87684. PubMed ID: 37430080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Life cycle assessment of plastic waste in Suzhou, China: Management strategies toward sustainable express delivery. Xu T; Yang J; Shao Z; Shen C; Yao F; Xia J; Zheng J; Wu Y; Kan S J Environ Manage; 2024 Jun; 360():121201. PubMed ID: 38796870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Application of life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management options in Hohhot, People's Republic of China. Liu M; Tan Z; Fan X; Chang Y; Wang L; Yin X Waste Manag Res; 2021 Jan; 39(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 32972328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of life cycle assessment for hospital solid waste management: A case study. Ali M; Wang W; Chaudhry N J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Oct; 66(10):1012-8. PubMed ID: 27268967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Carbon footprint of different recovery options for the repulping reject from liquid packaging board waste treatment process. Khan MMH; Laitinen V; Havukainen J; Horttanainen M Waste Manag; 2021 Dec; 136():93-103. PubMed ID: 34653854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Life cycle assessment of electronic waste treatment. Hong J; Shi W; Wang Y; Chen W; Li X Waste Manag; 2015 Apr; 38():357-65. PubMed ID: 25623003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Greenhouse gas emissions from solid waste in Beijing: The rising trend and the mitigation effects by management improvements. Yu Y; Zhang W Waste Manag Res; 2016 Apr; 34(4):368-77. PubMed ID: 26873911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Environmental and economic analysis of the transformation of paper mill sludge treatment technologies in China. Lin Y; Wei G; Liu H; Li K; Zhu Y; Han Q; Yang Y; Lian Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jun; 31(26):38251-38264. PubMed ID: 38797756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil. Martin EJP; Oliveira DSBL; Oliveira LSBL; Bezerra BS Waste Manag; 2021 Jan; 119():226-234. PubMed ID: 33075619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Study on greenhouse gas emissions from urban waste disposal system: a case study in Xiamen]. Yu Y; Cui SH; Lin JY; Li F Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Sep; 33(9):3288-94. PubMed ID: 23243894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Environmental impact assessment of the current, emerging, and alternative waste management systems using life cycle assessment tools: a case study of Johannesburg, South Africa. Adeleke O; Akinlabi SA; Jen TC; Dunmade I Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):7366-7381. PubMed ID: 34476692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of four disposal scenarios for used polyethylene terephthalate bottles in Mauritius. Foolmaun RK; Ramjeeawon T Environ Technol; 2012 Sep; 33(16-18):2007-18. PubMed ID: 23240194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Greenhouse gas emissions from different municipal solid waste management scenarios in China: Based on carbon and energy flow analysis. Liu Y; Sun W; Liu J Waste Manag; 2017 Oct; 68():653-661. PubMed ID: 28642075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]