145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38061268)
1. Factors that can affect divided speech intelligibility.
Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 441():108917. PubMed ID: 38061268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.
Bent T; Buchwald A; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?
Johnson EM; Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 32259460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The advantage of knowing the talker.
Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
Paulus M; Hazan V; Adank P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
Markham D; Hazan V
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.
Bent T; Bradlow AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 14514213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
