These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38061289)

  • 1. Salmon sperm DNA increases sample recovery from cotton swabs.
    Oechsle CM; Paul TA; Seichko JD; Worst TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():102996. PubMed ID: 38061289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
    Nori DV; McCord BR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
    Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
    Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
    Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
    Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
    Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of NucleoSpin® Forensic Filters on DNA recovery from trace DNA swabs.
    Heathfield LJ; Hitewa AN; Gibbon A; Mole CG
    Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):284-287. PubMed ID: 35598922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical note: Comparison of forensic swabs for intravaginal sampling.
    Egger S; Vöhringer C; Währer J; Schulz I
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jul; 62(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 35931447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
    Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms.
    Wise NM; Wagner SJ; Worst TJ; Sprague JE; Oechsle CM
    Microbiologyopen; 2021 Nov; 10(6):e1244. PubMed ID: 34964289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Menstrual cycle phase at the time of rape does not affect recovery of semen or amplification of STR profiles of a suspect in vaginal swabs.
    Cerdas L; Herrera F; Arrieta G; Morelli C; Álvarez K; Gómez A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Feb; 259():36-40. PubMed ID: 26734988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expedited, chemically enhanced sperm cell recovery from cotton swabs for rape kit analysis.
    Norris JV; Manning K; Linke SJ; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):800-5. PubMed ID: 17524064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
    Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
    Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
    Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.