116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38061394)
1. Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography in 1,000 Patients: A Follow-Up Study.
Nguyen K; Razzouk J; Brandt Z; Carlson P; Vyhmeister E; Bouterse A; Wycliffe N; Cheng W; Danisa O
Global Spine J; 2023 Dec; ():21925682231220043. PubMed ID: 38061394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography.
Harianja G; Razzouk J; Lindsey W; Urbina B; Cabrera A; Thomas L; Bouterse A; Wycliffe N; Cheng W; Danisa O
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Oct; 105(19):1512-1518. PubMed ID: 37471568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Normative Measurements of L1-S1 Segmental Angulation, Disk Space Height, and Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography.
Razzouk J; Case T; Brandt Z; Marciniak M; Sajdak G; Nguyen K; Small E; Petersen G; Kagabo W; Ramos O; Shaffrey CI; Cheng W; Danisa O
Neurosurgery; 2024 Apr; 94(4):813-827. PubMed ID: 38032205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Normative Measurements of L1 to S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Derived From Plain Film Radiography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Razzouk J; Vyhmeister E; Carter D; Sajdak G; Nguyen K; Carter M; Kagabo W; Ramos O; Wycliffe N; Cheng W; Danisa O
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Mar; 49(6):432-442. PubMed ID: 37937514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphometric analysis of cervical neuroforaminal dimensions from C2-T1 using computed tomography of 1,000 patients.
Razzouk J; Case T; Vyhmeister E; Nguyen K; Carter D; Carter M; Sajdak G; Kricfalusi M; Taylor R; Bedward D; Shin D; Wycliffe N; Ramos O; Lipa SA; Bono CM; Cheng W; Danisa O
Spine J; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38705281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of L1-S1 neuroforaminal dimensions derived from plain film radiography versus computed tomography.
Razzouk J; Carter D; Carter M; Vyhmeister E; Kagabo W; Ramos O; Douglas C; Wycliffe N; Cheng W; Danisa O
Eur Spine J; 2024 Jan; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 37925378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on anatomical parameters of adult lumbar intervertebral disc and endplate based on CT].
Han XM; Niu LP; Liu FX; Ma JX; Wang H
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 Jan; 36(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 36653011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI measurement of neuroforaminal dimension at the index and supradjacent levels after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study.
Cho W; Sokolowski MJ; Mehbod AA; Denis F; Garvey TA; Perl J; Transfeldt EE
Clin Orthop Surg; 2013 Mar; 5(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 23467381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EFFECTS OF IMAGE PLANE, PATIENT POSITIONING, AND FORAMINAL ZONE ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING MEASUREMENTS OF CANINE LUMBOSACRAL INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMINA.
Zindl C; Tucker RL; Jovanovik J; Gomez Alvarez C; Price D; Fitzpatrick N
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2017 Mar; 58(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 27862599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Specimen-Specific Kinematic Model for Ex Vivo Assessment of Lumbar Neuroforaminal Space.
Havey RM; Goodsitt J; Khayatzadeh S; Muriuki M; Potluri T; Voronov LI; Lomasney LM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(14):E814-22. PubMed ID: 25943082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of changes in lumbar neuroforaminal dimensions in symptomatic young adults using positional MRI.
Ren Z; Liu A; Yang K; Wang D; Buser Z; Wang JC
Eur Spine J; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1999-2006. PubMed ID: 28116511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional Changes of Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen in Direct Anterior Approach-Specific Hyperextension Supine Position.
Liu MY; Wang HB; Liu SW; Zhang GP; Liu JG; Yang C
Orthop Surg; 2020 Aug; 12(4):1173-1181. PubMed ID: 32596974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo 3D tomography of the lumbar spine using a twin robotic X-ray system: quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the lumbar neural foramina in supine and upright position.
Falkowski AL; Kovacs BK; Benz RM; Tobler P; Schön S; Stieltjes B; Hirschmann A
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3478-3490. PubMed ID: 33119812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oblique Sagittal Images Prevent Underestimation of the Neuroforaminal Stenosis Grade Caused by Disc Herniation in Cervical Spine MRI.
Kintzelé L; Rehnitz C; Kauczor HU; Weber MA
Rofo; 2018 Oct; 190(10):946-954. PubMed ID: 29874691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy.
Lee K; Jeong HS; Park C; Kim M; Ryu H; Roh J; Yeom JA; Kim JH; Kim TU; Jeon CH
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi; 2021 Jul; 82(4):862-875. PubMed ID: 36238060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting dynamic foraminal stenosis in the lumbar spine.
Singh V; Montgomery SR; Aghdasi B; Inoue H; Wang JC; Daubs MD
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23669126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine.
Chen D; Fay LA; Lok J; Yuan P; Edwards WT; Yuan HA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 7709283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stenosis of lumbar intervertebral foramen: anatomic study on predisposing factors.
Cinotti G; De Santis P; Nofroni I; Postacchini F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Feb; 27(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 11805682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
