These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38062014)

  • 1. The amygdala is not necessary for the familiarity aspect of recognition memory.
    Basile BM; Costa VD; Schafroth JL; Karaskiewicz CL; Lucas DR; Murray EA
    Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8109. PubMed ID: 38062014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition errors suggest fast familiarity and slow recollection in rhesus monkeys.
    Basile BM; Hampton RR
    Learn Mem; 2013 Jul; 20(8):431-7. PubMed ID: 23864646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double dissociation of selective recollection and familiarity impairments following two different surgical treatments for temporal-lobe epilepsy.
    Bowles B; Crupi C; Pigott S; Parrent A; Wiebe S; Janzen L; Köhler S
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2640-7. PubMed ID: 20466009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amygdala lesions selectively impair familiarity in recognition memory.
    Farovik A; Place RJ; Miller DR; Eichenbaum H
    Nat Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 14(11):1416-7. PubMed ID: 21946327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory.
    Eichenbaum H; Fortin N; Sauvage M; Robitsek RJ; Farovik A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(8):2281-9. PubMed ID: 19772865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similar time course of fast familiarity and slow recollection processes for recognition memory in humans and macaques.
    Wu Z; Kavanova M; Hickman L; Lin F; Buckley MJ
    Learn Mem; 2020 Jul; 27(7):258-269. PubMed ID: 32540915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala fail to produce impairment in visual learning for auditory secondary reinforcement but interfere with reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeys.
    Málková L; Gaffan D; Murray EA
    J Neurosci; 1997 Aug; 17(15):6011-20. PubMed ID: 9221797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.
    Edmonds EC; Glisky EL; Bartlett JC; Rapcsak SZ
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21787088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item repetition and response deadline affect familiarity and recollection differently across childhood.
    Koenig L; Wimmer MC; Trippas D
    Memory; 2020 Aug; 28(7):900-907. PubMed ID: 32657641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recollection and familiarity in dense hippocampal amnesia: a case study.
    Cipolotti L; Bird C; Good T; Macmanus D; Rudge P; Shallice T
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):489-506. PubMed ID: 16023686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus.
    Murray EA; Mishkin M
    J Neurosci; 1998 Aug; 18(16):6568-82. PubMed ID: 9698344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medial prefrontal cortex supports recollection, but not familiarity, in the rat.
    Farovik A; Dupont LM; Arce M; Eichenbaum H
    J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 28(50):13428-34. PubMed ID: 19074016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two processes support visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.
    Guderian S; Brigham D; Mishkin M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Nov; 108(48):19425-30. PubMed ID: 22084079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repetition increases false recollection in older people.
    Pitarque A; Sales A; Meléndez JC; Algarabel S
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Feb; 56(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25330138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing recollection and familiarity of similar lures in a behavioral pattern separation task.
    Kim J; Yassa MA
    Hippocampus; 2013 Apr; 23(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 23401187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective neurotoxic amygdala lesions in monkeys disrupt reactivity to food and object stimuli and have limited effects on memory.
    Stefanacci L; Clark RE; Zola SM
    Behav Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 117(5):1029-43. PubMed ID: 14570552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Brown EK; Hampton RR
    Learn Behav; 2020 Dec; 48(4):444-452. PubMed ID: 32638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Material Specificity Drives Medial Temporal Lobe Familiarity But Not Hippocampal Recollection.
    Kafkas A; Migo EM; Morris RG; Kopelman MD; Montaldi D; Mayes AR
    Hippocampus; 2017 Feb; 27(2):194-209. PubMed ID: 27859925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Brown EK; Basile BM; Templer VL; Hampton RR
    Anim Cogn; 2019 May; 22(3):331-341. PubMed ID: 30762160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.