These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38062364)

  • 1. Confounding-adjustment methods for the causal difference in medians.
    Shepherd DA; Baer BR; Moreno-Betancur M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):288. PubMed ID: 38062364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Simulation Study Comparing the Performance of Time-Varying Inverse Probability Weighting and G-Computation in Survival Analysis.
    Rudolph JE; Schisterman EF; Naimi AI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 192(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 36124667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
    Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A weighting method for simultaneous adjustment for confounding and joint exposure-outcome misclassifications.
    Penning de Vries BB; van Smeden M; Groenwold RH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):473-487. PubMed ID: 32998668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doubly robust estimation and sensitivity analysis for marginal structural quantile models.
    Cheng C; Hu L; Li F
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38884127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation from a known Cox MSM using standard parametric models for the g-formula.
    Young JG; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):1001-14. PubMed ID: 24151138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches.
    Berchialla P; Sciannameo V; Urru S; Lanera C; Azzolina D; Gregori D; Baldi I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal inference in case of near-violation of positivity: comparison of methods.
    Léger M; Chatton A; Le Borgne F; Pirracchio R; Lasocki S; Foucher Y
    Biom J; 2022 Dec; 64(8):1389-1403. PubMed ID: 34993990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse-Probability-Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects.
    Gruber S; Phillips RV; Lee H; van der Laan MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 191(9):1640-1651. PubMed ID: 35512316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating average treatment effects for clustered RCTs with recruitment bias.
    Schochet PZ
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):452-474. PubMed ID: 38037270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inverse probability weighting and doubly robust standardization in the relative survival framework.
    Syriopoulou E; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(27):6069-6092. PubMed ID: 34523751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted causal inference methods with mismeasured covariates and misclassified outcomes.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(10):1835-1854. PubMed ID: 30609095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inverse Probability Weights for Quasicontinuous Ordinal Exposures With a Binary Outcome: Method Comparison and Case Study.
    Sack DE; Shepherd BE; Audet CM; De Schacht C; Samuels LR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 192(7):1192-1206. PubMed ID: 37067471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the estimates of effect obtained from statistical causal inference methods: An example using bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle.
    Ji J; Wang C; He Z; Hay KE; Barnes TS; O'Connor AM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233960. PubMed ID: 32584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.