150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38063877)
21. Multiscale ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs and their driving mechanisms in the Han River Basin, China: implications for watershed management.
Zhang B; Zheng L; Wang Y; Li N; Li J; Yang H; Bi Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):43440-43454. PubMed ID: 36656473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-Term Effects of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Services and Their Spatial Interactions: A Case Study of Hainan Tropical Forest Park in China.
Zhong J; Cui L; Deng Z; Zhang Y; Lin J; Guo G; Zhang X
Environ Manage; 2024 Mar; 73(3):493-508. PubMed ID: 37853251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China.
Sun X; Yang P; Tao Y; Bian H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149849. PubMed ID: 34455273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ecosystem service trade-offs and spatial non-stationary responses to influencing factors in the Loess hilly-gully region: Lanzhou City, China.
Zhao T; Pan J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 846():157422. PubMed ID: 35850359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial-Temporal Variations and Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province, China.
Yang Q; Zhang P; Qiu X; Xu G; Chi J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36613177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dynamic simulation of land use change and habitat quality assessment under climate change scenarios in Nanchang, China.
Chen ZA; Chen Y; Liu Z; Wei X; Zheng X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(2):2569-2582. PubMed ID: 38066269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can human activities enhance the trade-off intensity of ecosystem services in arid inland river basins? Taking the Taolai River asin as an example.
Zhao T; Pan J; Bi F
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 861():160662. PubMed ID: 36473652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile regions.
Fang Z; Ding T; Chen J; Xue S; Zhou Q; Wang Y; Wang Y; Huang Z; Yang S
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 831():154967. PubMed ID: 35367552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China.
Wang LJ; Ma S; Qiao YP; Zhang JC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33114783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Investigating spatiotemporal dynamics and trade-off/synergy of multiple ecosystem services in response to land cover change: a case study of Nanjing city, China.
Zhao J; Li C
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Oct; 192(11):701. PubMed ID: 33051711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does increasing forest age lead to greater trade-offs in ecosystem services? A study of a Robinia pseudoacacia artificial forest on the Loess Plateau, China.
Zhao D; Bi H; Wang N; Liu Z; Hou G; Huang J; Song Y
Sci Total Environ; 2024 May; 926():171737. PubMed ID: 38508272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Towards sustainable forestry: Using a spatial Bayesian belief network to quantify trade-offs among forest-related ecosystem services.
Frizzle C; Fournier RA; Trudel M; Luther JE
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113817. PubMed ID: 34607136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigating the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ecosystem services for regional spatial management.
Yuan Y; Bai Z; Zhang J; Huang Y
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116591. PubMed ID: 36419288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service synergy and trade-off in Qinling Mountains, China].
Wang X; Mu Q; Luo MY; Zhao YH; Yang SY; Zhang L; Qu Z
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 33(8):2057-2067. PubMed ID: 36043811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modelling land system evolution and dynamics of terrestrial carbon stocks in the Luanhe River Basin, China: a scenario analysis of trade-offs and synergies between sustainable development goals.
Xu J; Renaud FG; Barrett B
Sustain Sci; 2022; 17(4):1323-1345. PubMed ID: 34306239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Land use and habitat quality change in the Yellow River Basin: A perspective with different CMIP6-based scenarios and multiple scales.
Ji X; Sun Y; Guo W; Zhao C; Li K
J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118729. PubMed ID: 37542811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Trade-offs and synergies relationships of ecosystem services and their socio-ecological driving factors under different spatial scales in Shaoguan City, Guangdong, China.
Deng YY; Wang D; Xu H
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2023 Nov; 34(11):3073-3084. PubMed ID: 37997419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service values: Effects of land-use changes from past to future (1860-2100).
Schirpke U; Tscholl S; Tasser E
J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 272():111068. PubMed ID: 32854880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Response and multiscenario simulation of trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services to the Grain to Green Program: a case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, China.
Chen T; Peng L; Wang Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(22):33572-33586. PubMed ID: 35029821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.
Hu Y; Peng J; Liu Y; Tian L
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():849-860. PubMed ID: 29306828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
