111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38064192)
1. Production of light-coloured, low heat-absorbing Holstein Friesian cattle by precise embryo-mediated genome editing.
Wei J; Brophy B; Cole SA; Leath S; Oback B; Boch J; Wells DN; Laible G
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2023 Dec; 36(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 38064192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Holstein Friesian dairy cattle edited for diluted coat color as a potential adaptation to climate change.
Laible G; Cole SA; Brophy B; Wei J; Leath S; Jivanji S; Littlejohn MD; Wells DN
BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):856. PubMed ID: 34836496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytoplasmic Injection of Zygotes to Genome Edit Naturally Occurring Sequence Variants Into Bovine Embryos.
Wei J; Brophy B; Cole SA; Moormann J; Boch J; Laible G
Front Genet; 2022; 13():925913. PubMed ID: 35899192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The genomes of precision edited cloned calves show no evidence for off-target events or increased de novo mutagenesis.
Jivanji S; Harland C; Cole S; Brophy B; Garrick D; Snell R; Littlejohn M; Laible G
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):457. PubMed ID: 34139989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-Step Homology Mediated CRISPR-Cas Editing in Zygotes for Generating Genome Edited Cattle.
Park KE; Frey JF; Waters J; Simpson SG; Coutu C; Plummer S; Campbell M; Donovan DM; Telugu BP
CRISPR J; 2020 Dec; 3(6):523-534. PubMed ID: 33252243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficient introgression of allelic variants by embryo-mediated editing of the bovine genome.
Wei J; Wagner S; Lu D; Maclean P; Carlson DF; Fahrenkrug SC; Laible G
Sci Rep; 2015 Jul; 5():11735. PubMed ID: 26156133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of gene editing efficiencies of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN for generation of MSTN knock-out cashmere goats.
Zhang J; Liu J; Yang W; Cui M; Dai B; Dong Y; Yang J; Zhang X; Liu D; Liang H; Cang M
Theriogenology; 2019 Jul; 132():1-11. PubMed ID: 30981084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of mouse and human preimplantation development following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 targeting reveals interspecies differences.
Stamatiadis P; Boel A; Cosemans G; Popovic M; Bekaert B; Guggilla R; Tang M; De Sutter P; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Menten B; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 33609360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Boosting targeted genome editing using the hei-tag.
Thumberger T; Tavhelidse-Suck T; Gutierrez-Triana JA; Cornean A; Medert R; Welz B; Freichel M; Wittbrodt J
Elife; 2022 Mar; 11():. PubMed ID: 35333175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome edited sheep and cattle.
Proudfoot C; Carlson DF; Huddart R; Long CR; Pryor JH; King TJ; Lillico SG; Mileham AJ; McLaren DG; Whitelaw CB; Fahrenkrug SC
Transgenic Res; 2015 Feb; 24(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 25204701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electroporation-Mediated Genome Editing of Livestock Zygotes.
Lin JC; Van Eenennaam AL
Front Genet; 2021; 12():648482. PubMed ID: 33927751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simplified pipelines for genetic engineering of mammalian embryos by CRISPR-Cas9 electroporation†.
Miao D; Giassetti MI; Ciccarelli M; Lopez-Biladeau B; Oatley JM
Biol Reprod; 2019 Jul; 101(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 31095680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation.
Gim GM; Eom KH; Kwon DH; Jung DJ; Kim DH; Yi JK; Ha JJ; Lee JH; Lee SB; Son WJ; Yum SY; Lee WW; Jang G
J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2023 Aug; 14(1):103. PubMed ID: 37543609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of mutation rates, mosaicism and off target mutations when injecting Cas9 mRNA or protein for genome editing of bovine embryos.
Hennig SL; Owen JR; Lin JC; Young AE; Ross PJ; Van Eenennaam AL; Murray JD
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):22309. PubMed ID: 33339870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic effects on coat colour in cattle: dilution of eumelanin and phaeomelanin pigments in an F2-Backcross Charolais x Holstein population.
Gutiérrez-Gil B; Wiener P; Williams JL
BMC Genet; 2007 Aug; 8():56. PubMed ID: 17705851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential thermal sensitivity between the recipient ooplasm and the donor nucleus in Holstein and Taiwan native yellow cattle.
Shen PC; Lee JW; Cheng WT; Su HY; Lee SN; Liu BT; Wang CH; Chen LR; Ju JC
Theriogenology; 2010 Dec; 74(9):1587-95. PubMed ID: 20708244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Homology-based repair induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in mammalian embryo genome editing.
Zhang X; Li T; Ou J; Huang J; Liang P
Protein Cell; 2022 May; 13(5):316-335. PubMed ID: 33945139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement of genome editing by electroporation using embryos artificially removed cumulus cells in the oviducts.
Kaneko T; Tanaka S
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2020 Jul; 527(4):1039-1042. PubMed ID: 32439162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cattle with a precise, zygote-mediated deletion safely eliminate the major milk allergen beta-lactoglobulin.
Wei J; Wagner S; Maclean P; Brophy B; Cole S; Smolenski G; Carlson DF; Fahrenkrug SC; Wells DN; Laible G
Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):7661. PubMed ID: 29769555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generation of mutant pigs by lipofection-mediated genome editing in embryos.
Hirata M; Wittayarat M; Namula Z; Le QA; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Thongkittidilok C; Mito T; Tomonari S; Tanihara F; Otoi T
Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23806. PubMed ID: 34903813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
