BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38064229)

  • 1. Cone Density Is Correlated to Outer Segment Length and Retinal Thickness in the Human Foveola.
    Domdei N; Ameln J; Gutnikov A; Witten JL; Holz FG; Wahl S; Harmening WM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2023 Dec; 64(15):11. PubMed ID: 38064229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peak Cone Density Predicted from Outer Segment Length Measured on Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Heitkotter H; Allphin MT; Untaroiu A; Min H; Warr E; Wynne N; Cooper RF; Carroll J
    Curr Eye Res; 2024 Mar; 49(3):314-324. PubMed ID: 38146597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability in Human Cone Topography Assessed by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.
    Zhang T; Godara P; Blanco ER; Griffin RL; Wang X; Curcio CA; Zhang Y
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 160(2):290-300.e1. PubMed ID: 25935100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Relationship Between Visual Sensitivity and Eccentricity, Cone Density and Outer Segment Length in the Human Foveola.
    Domdei N; Reiniger JL; Holz FG; Harmening WM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2021 Jul; 62(9):31. PubMed ID: 34289495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating outer segment length as a surrogate measure of peak foveal cone density.
    Wilk MA; Wilk BM; Langlo CS; Cooper RF; Carroll J
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():57-66. PubMed ID: 27887888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship Between Foveal Cone Structure and Visual Acuity Measured With Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy in Retinal Degeneration.
    Foote KG; Loumou P; Griffin S; Qin J; Ratnam K; Porco TC; Roorda A; Duncan JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jul; 59(8):3385-3393. PubMed ID: 30025078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective assessment of foveal cone loss ratio in surgically closed macular holes using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
    Yokota S; Ooto S; Hangai M; Takayama K; Ueda-Arakawa N; Yoshihara Y; Hanebuchi M; Yoshimura N
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63786. PubMed ID: 23717484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo assessment of foveal geometry and cone photoreceptor density and spacing in children.
    Mirhajianmoghadam H; Jnawali A; Musial G; Queener HM; Patel NB; Ostrin LA; Porter J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):8942. PubMed ID: 32487997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between foveal cone specialization and pit morphology in albinism.
    Wilk MA; McAllister JT; Cooper RF; Dubis AM; Patitucci TN; Summerfelt P; Anderson JL; Stepien KE; Costakos DM; Connor TB; Wirostko WJ; Chiang PW; Dubra A; Curcio CA; Brilliant MH; Summers CG; Carroll J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(7):4186-98. PubMed ID: 24845642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-resolution imaging of resolved central serous chorioretinopathy using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
    Ooto S; Hangai M; Sakamoto A; Tsujikawa A; Yamashiro K; Ojima Y; Yamada Y; Mukai H; Oshima S; Inoue T; Yoshimura N
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Sep; 117(9):1800-9, 1809.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20673590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human Foveal Cone and RPE Cell Topographies and Their Correspondence With Foveal Shape.
    Baraas RC; Pedersen HR; Knoblauch K; Gilson SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2022 Feb; 63(2):8. PubMed ID: 35113142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intervisit Reproducibility of Foveal Cone Density Metrics.
    Adhan I; Warr E; Grieshop J; Kreis J; Nikezic D; Walesa A; Hemsworth K; Cooper RF; Carroll J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Jun; 13(6):18. PubMed ID: 38913007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone Integrity in Glaucoma: An Adaptive-Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Study.
    Hasegawa T; Ooto S; Takayama K; Makiyama Y; Akagi T; Ikeda HO; Nakanishi H; Suda K; Yamada H; Uji A; Yoshimura N
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 171():53-66. PubMed ID: 27565227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Residual Foveal Cone Structure in CNGB3-Associated Achromatopsia.
    Langlo CS; Patterson EJ; Higgins BP; Summerfelt P; Razeen MM; Erker LR; Parker M; Collison FT; Fishman GA; Kay CN; Zhang J; Weleber RG; Yang P; Wilson DJ; Pennesi ME; Lam BL; Chiang J; Chulay JD; Dubra A; Hauswirth WW; Carroll J;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):3984-95. PubMed ID: 27479814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human Foveal Cone and Müller Cells Examined by Adaptive Optics Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Kadomoto S; Muraoka Y; Uji A; Ooto S; Kawai K; Ishikura M; Nishigori N; Akagi T; Tsujikawa A
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Sep; 10(11):17. PubMed ID: 34559184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length.
    Li KY; Tiruveedhula P; Roorda A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6858-67. PubMed ID: 20688730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Macular cone abnormalities in retinitis pigmentosa with preserved central vision using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
    Makiyama Y; Ooto S; Hangai M; Takayama K; Uji A; Oishi A; Ogino K; Nakagawa S; Yoshimura N
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79447. PubMed ID: 24260224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
    Ooto S; Hangai M; Takayama K; Sakamoto A; Tsujikawa A; Oshima S; Inoue T; Yoshimura N
    Ophthalmology; 2011 May; 118(5):873-81. PubMed ID: 21074858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-resolution imaging of photoreceptors in macular microholes.
    Ooto S; Hangai M; Takayama K; Ueda-Arakawa N; Makiyama Y; Hanebuchi M; Yoshimura N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Aug; 55(9):5932-43. PubMed ID: 25146990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the spatial relationship between fixation and foveal specializations.
    Wilk MA; Dubis AM; Cooper RF; Summerfelt P; Dubra A; Carroll J
    Vision Res; 2017 Mar; 132():53-61. PubMed ID: 27286921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.