134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38065513)
1. Analyzing methods for reducing recurrence rates after EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: an indirect pairwise comparison.
Radadiya D; Desai M; Patel H; Srinivasan S; Chandrasekar VT; Hassan C; Repici A; Rex D; Sharma P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Mar; 99(3):326-336.e6. PubMed ID: 38065513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Snare Tip Soft Coagulation vs Argon Plasma Coagulation vs No Margin Treatment After Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyp Resection: a Randomized Trial.
Rex DK; Haber GB; Khashab M; Rastogi A; Hasan MK; DiMaio CJ; Kumta NA; Nagula S; Gordon S; Al-Kawas F; Waye JD; Razjouyan H; Dye CE; Moyer MT; Shultz J; Lahr RE; Yuen PYS; Dixon R; Boyd L; Pohl H
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Mar; 22(3):552-561.e4. PubMed ID: 37871841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.
Kemper G; Gerges C; Schoon EJ; Schreuder RM; Schrauwen RRW; Epping LSM; Beyna T; Drenth JPH; Gündug U; Siersema PD; van Geenen EJM;
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):132. PubMed ID: 38368409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EMR combined with hybrid argon plasma coagulation to prevent recurrence of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (with videos).
Motchum L; Levenick JM; Djinbachian R; Moyer MT; Bouchard S; Taghiakbari M; Repici A; Deslandres É; von Renteln D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Nov; 96(5):840-848.e2. PubMed ID: 35724695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Tziatzios G; Papaefthymiou A; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Marco S; Frazzoni L; Fuccio L; Paraskeva KD; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K; Messmann H; Gkolfakis P
Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jul; 55(7):856-864. PubMed ID: 36336608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Margin marking before colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection and its impact on neoplasia recurrence (with video).
Yang D; Draganov PV; King W; Liu N; Sarheed A; Bhat A; Jiang P; Ladna M; Ruiz NC; Wilson J; Gorrepati VS; Pohl H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 May; 95(5):956-965. PubMed ID: 34861250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
Mangira D; Raftopoulos S; Vogrin S; Hartley I; Mack A; Gazelakis K; Nalankilli K; Trinh A; Metz AJ; Appleyard M; Grimpen F; Elliott T; Brown G; Moss A
Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rotermund C; Djinbachian R; Taghiakbari M; Enderle MD; Eickhoff A; von Renteln D
World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 28(29):4007-4018. PubMed ID: 36157546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Avulsion is superior to argon plasma coagulation for treatment of visible residual neoplasia during EMR of colorectal polyps (with videos).
Holmes I; Kim HG; Yang DH; Friedland S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Nov; 84(5):822-829. PubMed ID: 27080417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized trial.
Horiuchi A; Makino T; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 27100717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.
Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Spadaccini M; Aziz M; Maselli R; Hassan S; Fuccio L; Duvvuri A; Frazzoni L; Desai M; Fugazza A; Jegadeesan R; Colombo M; Dasari CS; Hassan C; Sharma P; Repici A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):929-936.e3. PubMed ID: 30639542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of margin ablation after EMR of large nonpedunculated colonic polyps in routine clinical practice.
Abu Arisha M; Scapa E; Wishahi E; Korytny A; Gorelik Y; Mazzawi F; Khader M; Muaalem R; Bana S; Awadie H; Bourke MJ; Klein A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):559-567. PubMed ID: 36328207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
Oh CK; Cho YS; Lee SH; Lee BI
Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 35750321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local recurrence rates after resection of large colorectal serrated lesions with or without margin thermal ablation.
Djinbachian R; Amar L; Pohl H; Safih W; Bouchard S; Deslandres E; Dorais J; von Renteln D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2024; 59(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 37743643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
