These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38065620)

  • 1. Adjudicative Competence in the Context of a Defendant's Absence from Trial after a Suicide Attempt.
    Williams JB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2023 Dec; 51(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 38065620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the accuracy of forensic examiners in the absence of a "gold standard".
    Mossman D; Bowen MD; Vanness DJ; Bienenfeld D; Correll T; Kay J; Klykylo WM; Lehrer DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 19771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional protection of confessions made by mentally retarded defendants.
    Praiss DM
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 14(4):431-65. PubMed ID: 2729294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an American legal perspective.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 18086744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjudicative competence: evidence that impairment in "rational understanding" is taxonic.
    Marcus DK; Poythress NG; Edens JF; Lilienfeld SO
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 20822285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linguistic diversity in deaf defendants and due process rights.
    Miller KR; Vernon M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2001; 6(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 15451852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of juveniles' ages and levels of psychosocial maturity on judges' opinions about adjudicative competence.
    Cox JM; Goldstein NE; Dolores J; Zelechoski AD; Messenheimer S
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22471382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of criminal defendants referred for multiple psychiatric examinations regarding their competency to stand trial.
    Bluestone H; Melella J; Baskin D
    J Forensic Sci; 1981 Apr; 26(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 7264586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competence to stand trial: clinician reliability and the role of offense severity.
    Rosenfeld B; Ritchie K
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 9456535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pro se competence in the aftermath of Indiana v. Edwards.
    Morris DR; Frierson RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 19092075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competency restoration: an examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency.
    Hubbard KL; Zapf PA; Ronan KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 12733417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidelines for determining restorability of competency to stand trial and recommendations for involuntary treatment.
    Cochrane RE; Laxton KL; Mulay AL; Herbel BL
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1201-1209. PubMed ID: 34032278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Connecticut Experience with
    Norko MA; Cotterell MS; Hollis T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):473-483. PubMed ID: 32675332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancing the Value of Expert Assistance in Pro Se Competence Determinations.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):437-441. PubMed ID: 28003387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competence to stand trial should require rational understanding.
    Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 21389162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Proposed Model for Assessing Defendant Competence to Self-Represent.
    White MM; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 28003386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of Misdemeanants Treated for Competency Restoration.
    Gillis A; Holoyda B; Newman WJ; Wilson MD; Xiong GL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):442-450. PubMed ID: 28003388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.