122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38065717)
1. Integration of Multiparameter MRI into Conventional Pretreatment Risk Factors to Predict Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy.
Ma MW; Wang K; Gao XS; Zhu TZ; Li HZ; Shen Q; Yang KW; Qiu JX
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2024 Apr; 22(2):281-290.e1. PubMed ID: 38065717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and internal validation of a side-specific, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.
Martini A; Gupta A; Lewis SC; Cumarasamy S; Haines KG; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Tewari AK
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 29676063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative MRI-based estimation of risk for positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: development and validation of a simple scoring system.
Park MY; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4898-4907. PubMed ID: 33386982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intravoxel incoherent motion predicts positive surgical margins and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Meng S; Gan W; Chen L; Wang N; Liu A
Radiol Med; 2023 Jun; 128(6):668-678. PubMed ID: 37277573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Other Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features for the Prediction of Positive Surgical Margins in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Alessi S; Maggioni R; Luzzago S; Colombo A; Pricolo P; Summers PE; Saia G; Manzoni M; Renne G; Marvaso G; De Cobelli O; Bellomi M; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Dec; 19(6):e335-e345. PubMed ID: 34023239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.
Ryu JH; Kim YB; Jung TY; Ko WJ; Kim SI; Kwon D; Kim DY; Oh TH; Yoo TK
J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Oct; 36(41):e256. PubMed ID: 34697927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External Validation of Models for Prediction of Side-specific Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Diamand R; Roche JB; Lievore E; Lacetera V; Chiacchio G; Beatrici V; Mastroianni R; Simone G; Windisch O; Benamran D; Favre MM; Fourcade A; Nguyen TA; Fournier G; Fiard G; Ploussard G; Roumeguère T; Peltier A; Albisinni S
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 36153227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a new nomogram to predict insignificant prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Kim TH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28168924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Independent external validation of nomogram to predict extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer.
Alves JR; Muglia VF; Lucchesi FR; Faria RAOG; Alcantara-Quispe C; Vazquez VL; Reis RB; Faria EF
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):5004-5010. PubMed ID: 32307562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Disease-A Risk Model for Patient-tailored Risk Stratification When Planning Radical Prostatectomy.
Nyarangi-Dix J; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Hitthaler B; Schütz V; Dieffenbacher S; Mueller-Wolf M; Roth W; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Roethke M; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Nov; 6(6):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 30477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of three-dimensional visualization of preoperative prostatic magnetic resonance imaging based on measurements of anatomical structures in predicting positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.
Fan B; Zhang L; Wang Y; Dai Z; Pan H; Xie J; Wang H; Xin Z; Wang Y; Duan X; Luo J; Wang L; Liu Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1228892. PubMed ID: 37859989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension and Prostatectomy Outcome in Patients with Low-, Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Try to Find a Standard.
Radtke JP; Hadaschik BA; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Schwab C; Alt C; Roth W; Duensing S; Pahernik SA; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Teber D
J Endourol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1396-405. PubMed ID: 26154571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single Positive Core Prostate Cancer at Biopsy: Clinicopathological Implications and Risk Factors for Adverse Pathological Outcomes.
Mao Q; Lin Y; Xia D; Wang S; Jiang H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2022 Jun; 20(3):e205-e209. PubMed ID: 35027314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Castellani D; Cecchini S; Mazzucchelli R; Soraci L; Di Rosa M; Fabbietti P; Palagonia E; Puccio F; Carnevali F; Paci E; Montironi R; Galosi AB
Urol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 40(8):379.e1-379.e8. PubMed ID: 35662497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
