These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38066484)

  • 41. Impact of body mass index on perioperative and oncological outcomes in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Tong C; Lu H; Zhu H; Wu J
    Cancer Med; 2022 Aug; 11(15):2913-2922. PubMed ID: 35312237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis.
    Okabe H; Tsunoda S; Sunagawa H; Saji M; Hirai K; Nakau M; Tanaka E; Obama K
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 33837477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prognostic value of inflammatory markers for detecting anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection.
    Liesenfeld LF; Sauer P; Diener MK; Hinz U; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP; Hackert T; Büchler MW; Schaible A
    BMC Surg; 2020 Dec; 20(1):324. PubMed ID: 33298038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Serum albumin at resection predicts in-hospital death, while serum lactate and aPTT on the first postoperative day anticipate anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy.
    Scheufele F; Vogel T; Gasiorek M; Novotny A; Friess H; Demir IE; Schorn S
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Sep; 407(6):2309-2317. PubMed ID: 35482049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Novel prognostic score of postoperative complications after transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 90 consecutive patients.
    Saito T; Tanaka K; Ebihara Y; Kurashima Y; Murakami S; Shichinohe T; Hirano S
    Esophagus; 2019 Apr; 16(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 30178429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.
    Lee JM; Cheng JW; Lin MT; Huang PM; Chen JS; Lee YC
    World J Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 21327605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Safety and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score matching.
    Hong ZN; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Weng K; Peng K; Lin J; Kang M
    Esophagus; 2022 Apr; 19(2):224-232. PubMed ID: 34988773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy a viable option in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Klevebro F; Han S; Ash S; Mueller C; Cools-Lartigue J; Maynard N; Ferri L; Low D
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35511475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Validation of the NUn score as a predictor of anastomotic leak and major complications after Esophagectomy.
    Bundred J; Hollis AC; Hodson J; Hallissey MT; Whiting JL; Griffiths EA
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jan; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 31076741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of comorbidity on outcomes and overall survival after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Dolan JP; Kaur T; Diggs BS; Luna RA; Schipper PH; Tieu BH; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4094-103. PubMed ID: 23846365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
    Klevebro F; Johnsen G; Johnson E; Viste A; Myrnäs T; Szabo E; Jacobsen AB; Friesland S; Tsai JA; Persson S; Lindblad M; Lundell L; Nilsson M
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):920-6. PubMed ID: 25908010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Study on the association of gastric conduit width and postoperative early delayed gastric emptying in middle-lower esophageal cancer patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis procedure].
    Zhen F; Shi S; Xue L; Liu J; Luo J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):985-989. PubMed ID: 27680064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
    Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of high flow nasal cannula following minimally invasive esophagectomy in ICU patients: A prospective pre-post study.
    Hsiao WL; Hung WT; Yang CH; Lai YH; Kuo SW; Liao HC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2023 Dec; 122(12):1247-1254. PubMed ID: 37280137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. FA01.02: THE EFFECT OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER MIE ON LONG-TERM SURVIVAL: A RETROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER COHORT STUDY.
    Fransen L; Berkelmans G; Asti E; Van Berge Henegouwen M; Berlth F; Bonavina L; Brown A; Bruns C; Gisbertz S; Grimminger P; Gutschow C; Hölscher A; Kauppi J; Lagarde SM; Mercer S; Moons J; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Palazzo F; Pattyn P; Philippron A; Raptis D; Räsänen J; Rosato E; Rouvelas I; Schmidt H; Schneider P; Schröder W; Wijnhoven BPL; Grard AP; Nieuwenhuijzen ; Luyer M
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The association between postoperative complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study.
    Fransen LFC; Verhoeven RHA; Janssen THJB; van Det MJ; Gisbertz SS; van Hillegersberg R; Klarenbeek B; Kouwenhoven EA; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Luyer MDP
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 May; 36(6):. PubMed ID: 36477850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Association of postoperative outcome with fasting plasma glucose and risk factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Duan X; Gong L; Shang X; Jiang H; Tang P; Yu Z
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1004-1008. PubMed ID: 27680068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.