These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38066527)

  • 21. [Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].
    Pu XY; Luo WY; Gao MX; Ma GF; Zhang C; Chi F; Qian YW
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 May; 35(5):409-17. PubMed ID: 35535527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for degree
    Fu H; Hu Y; Yang D; Wang X; Xu W
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 38(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 38385229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.
    Wang L; Li C; Wang Z; Li D; Tian Y; Yuan S; Liu X
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):473-485. PubMed ID: 35788970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
    Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Hua W; Wang B; Ke W; Wu X; Zhang Y; Li S; Yang S; Yang C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):785. PubMed ID: 33246434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in China: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
    Wu Z; Luo T; Yang Y; Pang M; Chen R; Xie P; Yang B; He L; Huang Z; Li S; Dong J; Liu B; Rong L; Zhang L
    BMJ Open; 2024 Sep; 14(9):e083786. PubMed ID: 39322595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does Simultaneous Fusion of Preexisting Spinal Canal Stenosis Adjacent to Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Achieve a Better Clinical Outcome? A Retrospective Study with More than 5-year Follow-Up.
    Wang X; Zhang S; Wang Y; Shen Y; Zhao Y; Wu X
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2023 Sep; 84(5):433-438. PubMed ID: 35901853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparative study on effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic and Wiltse-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Zhu G; Hao Y; Yu L; Zhang P; Cao S
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 36(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 35038802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of effectiveness between percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Liu J; Kong Q; Feng P; Zhang B; Ma J; Hu Y; Wu X; Shu X; Pu C
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):681-690. PubMed ID: 35712924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
    Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study.
    Du X; She Y; Ou Y; Zhu Y; Luo W; Jiang D
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6693446. PubMed ID: 33824877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparison of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment between open- and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions].
    Zhang Y; Li F; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Yu Y; Cheng L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 34(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 32291975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease.
    Kim JE; Yoo HS; Choi DJ; Park EJ; Jee SM
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Mar; 34(2):E64-E71. PubMed ID: 33633061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery.
    Heo DH; Park CK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E18. PubMed ID: 30933919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.