These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38066702)

  • 21. Deep learning versus parametric and ensemble methods for genomic prediction of complex phenotypes.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Gianola D; Peñagaricano F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):12. PubMed ID: 32093611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic prediction ability for feed efficiency traits using different models and pseudo-phenotypes under several validation strategies in Nelore cattle.
    Brunes LC; Baldi F; Lopes FB; Narciso MG; Lobo RB; Espigolan R; Costa MFO; Magnabosco CU
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100085. PubMed ID: 33573965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane.
    Islam MS; McCord PH; Olatoye MO; Qin L; Sood S; Lipka AE; Todd JR
    Plant Genome; 2021 Nov; 14(3):e20148. PubMed ID: 34510803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.
    Al-Khudhair A; VanRaden PM; Null DJ; Li B
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4478-4485. PubMed ID: 33612229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting complex traits using a diffusion kernel on genetic markers with an application to dairy cattle and wheat data.
    Morota G; Koyama M; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jun; 45(1):17. PubMed ID: 23763755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Target enrichment sequencing of 307 germplasm accessions identified ancestry of ancient and modern hybrids and signatures of adaptation and selection in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), a 'sweet' crop with 'bitter' genomes.
    Yang X; Song J; Todd J; Peng Z; Paudel D; Luo Z; Ma X; You Q; Hanson E; Zhao Z; Zhao Y; Zhang J; Ming R; Wang J
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2019 Feb; 17(2):488-498. PubMed ID: 30051590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genomic Selection with Allele Dosage in
    de C Lara LA; Santos MF; Jank L; Chiari L; Vilela MM; Amadeu RR; Dos Santos JPR; Pereira GDS; Zeng ZB; Garcia AAF
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2463-2475. PubMed ID: 31171567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits.
    MacLeod IM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Haile-Mariam M; Kemper KE; Chamberlain AJ; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Feb; 17():144. PubMed ID: 26920147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection in sugarcane based on inbreeding depression.
    de Azeredo AA; Bhering LL; Brasileiro BP; Cruz CD; Barbosa MH
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 May; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 27323098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of genotype imputation on genome-enabled prediction of complex traits: an empirical study with mice data.
    Felipe VP; Okut H; Gianola D; Silva MA; Rosa GJ
    BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():149. PubMed ID: 25544265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Advantages of continuous genotype values over genotype classes for GWAS in higher polyploids: a comparative study in hexaploid chrysanthemum.
    Grandke F; Singh P; Heuven HC; de Haan JR; Metzler D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):672. PubMed ID: 27554097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: a case study with Jersey cows and wheat.
    Gianola D; Okut H; Weigel KA; Rosa GJ
    BMC Genet; 2011 Oct; 12():87. PubMed ID: 21981731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.
    Chen L; Li C; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101544. PubMed ID: 25025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
    Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.