These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38067054)

  • 1. Mitigating the Environmental Impacts from Pig and Broiler Chicken Productions: Case Study on a Citrus Extract Feed Additive.
    Bui H; Cisse SH; Ceccaldi M; Perrin A; Benarbia MEA; Chicoteau P
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(23):. PubMed ID: 38067054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds.
    Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Espagnol S; Laisse-Redoux S; Gaudré D; Méda B; Wilfart A
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 30378514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
    Méda B; Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Ponchant P; Espagnol S; Wilfart A
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100024. PubMed ID: 33750548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs.
    Hickmann FMW; Andretta I; Létourneau-Montminy MP; Remus A; Galli GM; Vittori J; Kipper M
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():732253. PubMed ID: 34708101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amino Acid Supplementation to Reduce Environmental Impacts of Broiler and Pig Production: A Review.
    Cappelaere L; Le Cour Grandmaison J; Martin N; Lambert W
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689259. PubMed ID: 34381834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the inclusion of a feed additive of sodium humate derived from freshwater sapropel in diets for broiler chickens.
    Proskina L; Barzdina D; Valdovska A; Pilvere I; Vircava I; Cerina S; Meskis S
    Vet World; 2023 Oct; 16(10):2029-2041. PubMed ID: 38023265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine characterization and microbiota assessment as keys to understanding the positive effect of standardized natural citrus extract on broiler chickens.
    Cisse S; Bahut M; Marais C; Zemb O; Chicoteau P; Benarbia MEA; Guilet D
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36881787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment.
    Kebreab E; Liedke A; Caro D; Deimling S; Binder M; Finkbeiner M
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2664-81. PubMed ID: 27285941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
    Leinonen I; Kyriazakis I
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2016 Aug; 75(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 26935025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Dietary Yeast Mannan-Rich Fraction on Broiler Performance and the Implication for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Chicken Production.
    Salami SA; Taylor-Pickard J; Ross SA; Moran CA
    Animals (Basel); 2024 May; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 38891642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights From a Systematic Review.
    Andretta I; Hickmann FMW; Remus A; Franceschi CH; Mariani AB; Orso C; Kipper M; Létourneau-Montminy MP; Pomar C
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():750733. PubMed ID: 34778435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental impacts of eco-nutrition swine feeding programs in spatially explicit geographic regions of the United States.
    Shurson GC; Pelton REO; Yang Z; Urriola PE; Schmitt J
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36305772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.
    Parajuli R; Dalgaard T; Birkved M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():127-143. PubMed ID: 29145050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing energy state and environmental impacts in ostrich and chicken production systems.
    Ramedani Z; Alimohammadian L; Kheialipour K; Delpisheh P; Abbasi Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Sep; 26(27):28284-28293. PubMed ID: 31363980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of changing toward higher welfare broiler production systems on greenhouse gas emissions: a Dutch case study using life cycle assessment.
    Mostert PF; Bos AP; van Harn J; de Jong IC
    Poult Sci; 2022 Dec; 101(12):102151. PubMed ID: 36279609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance.
    de Quelen F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY; Garcia-Launay F
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689012. PubMed ID: 34295934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of dietary protease on nitrogen emissions from broiler production: a holistic comparison using Life Cycle Assessment.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG
    J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Dec; 95(15):3041-6. PubMed ID: 25857285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork production.
    Soleimani T; Hermesch S; Gilbert H
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33587146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment.
    Mosnier E; van der Werf HM; Boissy J; Dourmad JY
    Animal; 2011 Dec; 5(12):1972-83. PubMed ID: 22440474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The environmental footprints of the feeds used by the EU chicken meat industry.
    Sporchia F; Galli A; Kastner T; Pulselli FM; Caro D
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Aug; 886():163960. PubMed ID: 37149183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.