244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38069008)
1. Influence of Topography and Composition of Commercial Titanium Dental Implants on Cell Adhesion of Human Gingiva-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An In Vitro Study.
Campos-Bijit V; Inostroza NC; Orellana R; Rivera A; Von Marttens A; Cortez C; Covarrubias C
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Nov; 24(23):. PubMed ID: 38069008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Nano, Micro, and Macro Topography of Dental Implant Surfaces on Human Gingival Fibroblasts.
Petrini M; Pierfelice TV; D'Amico E; Di Pietro N; Pandolfi A; D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Mandatori D; Schiavone V; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 34576038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micro/nanostructured calcium phytate coating on titanium fabricated by chemical conversion deposition for biomedical application.
Zhang H; Liu K; Lu M; Liu L; Yan Y; Chu Z; Ge Y; Wang T; Qiu J; Bu S; Tang C
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Jan; 118():111402. PubMed ID: 33255005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of cold atmospheric plasma on dental implant materials - an in vitro analysis.
Wagner G; Eggers B; Duddeck D; Kramer FJ; Bourauel C; Jepsen S; Deschner J; Nokhbehsaim M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2949-2963. PubMed ID: 34907458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on modified titanium surfaces.
Lukaszewska-Kuska M; Wirstlein P; Majchrowski R; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
Micron; 2018 Feb; 105():55-63. PubMed ID: 29179009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micro-/nano-topography of selective laser melting titanium enhances adhesion and proliferation and regulates adhesion-related gene expressions of human gingival fibroblasts and human gingival epithelial cells.
Xu R; Hu X; Yu X; Wan S; Wu F; Ouyang J; Deng F
Int J Nanomedicine; 2018; 13():5045-5057. PubMed ID: 30233172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Titanium Nano-Foveolae Surfaces on Human Gingival Fibroblasts.
Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Kong T; Ye B; Li X; Ji P; Sun S
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2020 Feb; 20(2):673-679. PubMed ID: 31383062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancing osseointegration of titanium implants through large-grit sandblasting combined with micro-arc oxidation surface modification.
He W; Yin X; Xie L; Liu Z; Li J; Zou S; Chen J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Jun; 30(6):73. PubMed ID: 31187259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Microcosm Biofilm Decontamination on Surface Topography, Chemistry, and Biocompatibility Dynamics of Implant Titanium Surfaces.
Sousa V; Mardas N; Spratt D; Hassan IA; Walters NJ; Beltrán V; Donos N
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36077428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface characterization of SLActive dental implants.
Zinelis S; Silikas N; Thomas A; Syres K; Eliades G
Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(1):72-92. PubMed ID: 22319766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early cell response of osteogenic cells on differently modified implant surfaces: Sequences of cell proliferation, adherence and differentiation.
Blatt S; Pabst AM; Schiegnitz E; Hosang M; Ziebart T; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Klein MO
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 46(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 29325889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Considering the Value of 3D Cultures for Enhancing the Understanding of Adhesion, Proliferation, and Osteogenesis on Titanium Dental Implants.
Ferro F; Azzolin F; Spelat R; Bevilacqua L; Maglione M
Biomolecules; 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37509084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wettability of implant surfaces: Blood vs autologous platelet liquid (APL).
Scarano A; Tari Rexhep S; Leo L; Lorusso F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():104773. PubMed ID: 34690099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface characteristics and cell adhesion: a comparative study of four commercial dental implants.
Liu R; Lei T; Dusevich V; Yao X; Liu Y; Walker MP; Wang Y; Ye L
J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):641-51. PubMed ID: 23725293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of early osseointegration between laser-treated/acid-etched and sandblasted/acid-etched titanium implant surfaces.
Rong M; Lu H; Wan L; Zhang X; Lin X; Li S; Zhou L; Lv Y; Su Y
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(4):43. PubMed ID: 29603028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Roughness, Wettability, and SEM Features between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants.
Chhabra K; Rajasekar A
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2024; 34(4):57-63. PubMed ID: 38842233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. An in vitro comparative study.
Conserva E; Menini M; Ravera G; Pera P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22251013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
