202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38069588)
1. The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review.
Brown C; Neerland CE; Weinfurter EV; Saftner MA
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2023; 68(6):744-758. PubMed ID: 38069588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of Telehealth in Promoting Equitable Abortion Access in the United States: Spatial Analysis.
Koenig LR; Becker A; Ko J; Upadhyay UD
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2023 Nov; 9():e45671. PubMed ID: 37934583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "The right thing to do would be to provide care… and we can't": Provider experiences with Georgia's 22-week abortion ban.
Hartwig SA; Youm A; Contreras A; Mosley EA; McCloud C; Goedken P; Carroll E; Lathrop E; Cwiak C; Hall KS
Contraception; 2023 Aug; 124():110059. PubMed ID: 37160176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians.
Samuels-Kalow ME; Agrawal P; Rodriguez G; Zeidan A; Love JS; Monette D; Lin M; Cooper RJ; Madsen TE; Dobiesz V
Acad Emerg Med; 2022 Dec; 29(12):1414-1421. PubMed ID: 36268814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid Transition to Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Implications for Primary Care Access and Equity in a Post-COVID Era.
Chang JE; Lai AY; Gupta A; Nguyen AM; Berry CA; Shelley DR
Milbank Q; 2021 Jun; 99(2):340-368. PubMed ID: 34075622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.
Boydell N; Reynolds-Wright JJ; Cameron ST; Harden J
BJOG; 2021 Oct; 128(11):1752-1761. PubMed ID: 34138505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Remote Delivery in Reproductive Health Care: Operation of Direct-to-Patient Telehealth Medication Abortion Services in Diverse Settings.
Fiastro AE; Sanan S; Jacob-Files E; Wells E; Coeytaux F; Ruben MR; Bennett IM; Godfrey EM
Ann Fam Med; 2022; 20(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 35831175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)?
Räsänen J; Gothreau C; Lippert-Rasmussen K
J Med Ethics; 2022 Dec; 48(12):952-956. PubMed ID: 36180204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The state of abortion rights in the US.
Davis MF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Next Infodemic: Abortion Misinformation.
Pagoto SL; Palmer L; Horwitz-Willis N
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e42582. PubMed ID: 37140975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in 4 United States clinical practice settings.
Godfrey EM; Fiastro AE; Jacob-Files EA; Coeytaux FM; Wells ES; Ruben MR; Sanan SS; Bennett IM
Contraception; 2021 Jul; 104(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 33932401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
