169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38069606)
1. Relationship between the severity of emphysematous change in the lung and morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A retrospective study on a novel strategy for risk prediction.
Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Shiraishi S; Hara Y; Matsumoto C; Toihata T; Kosumi K; Harada K; Eto K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
Thorac Cancer; 2024 Jan; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 38069606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may contribute to low incidence of postoperative surgical site infection in patients with poor glycemic control.
Yamane T; Yoshida N; Horinouchi T; Morinaga T; Eto K; Harada K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Mar; 407(2):579-585. PubMed ID: 34459983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Esophageal Position Affects Short-Term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Uchihara T; Yoshida N; Baba Y; Nakashima Y; Kimura Y; Saeki H; Takeno S; Sadanaga N; Ikebe M; Morita M; Toh Y; Nanashima A; Maehara Y; Baba H
World J Surg; 2020 Mar; 44(3):831-837. PubMed ID: 31701157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
Byiringiro I; Aurit SJ; Nandipati KC
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4018-4027. PubMed ID: 36097100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Rong Y; Hao Y; Xue J; Li X; Li Q; Wang L; Li T
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():934950. PubMed ID: 36267968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy by comprehensive complication index.
Ma G; Cao H; Wei R; Qu X; Wang L; Zhu L; Du J; Wang Y
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(4):789-794. PubMed ID: 29970654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Versus Open McKeown for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Zheng Y; Li Y; Liu X; Sun H; Shen S; Ba Y; Wang Z; Liu S; Xing W
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):6329-6336. PubMed ID: 33987755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Replace Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer? Latest Analysis of 24,233 Esophagectomies From the Japanese National Clinical Database.
Yoshida N; Yamamoto H; Baba H; Miyata H; Watanabe M; Toh Y; Matsubara H; Kakeji Y; Seto Y
Ann Surg; 2020 Jul; 272(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 30720501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
