These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38070075)

  • 21. Development of a digital impression procedure using photogrammetry for complete denture fabrication.
    Matsuda T; Goto T; Kurahashi K; Kashiwabara T; Ichikawa T
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 27644177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
    Amin S; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 28039903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Lanis A; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):150-164. PubMed ID: 37586762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of scanbody design and intraoral scanner on the trueness of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study.
    Meneghetti PC; Li J; Borella PS; Mendonça G; Burnett LH
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295790. PubMed ID: 38113200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Complete digital workflow for complete arch implant therapy: Fact or fiction?
    Bedrossian EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):821-822. PubMed ID: 35778293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of conventional impressions versus digital scans for the all-on-four treatment in the maxillary arch: An in vitro study.
    Marshaha NJ; Azhari AA; Assery MK; Ahmed WM
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 36811911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digitally Designed and Milled Verification Jigs Generated from Photogrammetry Data Acquisition: A Clinical Report.
    Sinada N; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):651-655. PubMed ID: 34296484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies.
    Kong L; Li Y; Liu Z
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5625-5642. PubMed ID: 35786783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital Impression Taking for Maxillary Full-Arch Restoration With Immediate Loading: A Case Report.
    Rico JP; Brinkmann JC; Martin MC; González MA; Arribas CT; Alonso VR; Suárez CL; Suárez García MJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Apr; 48(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 33710306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stereophotogrammetry for Recording the Position of Multiple Implants: Technical Description.
    Agustín-Panadero R; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Gomar-Vercher S; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 26523726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigation of the Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners in Mandibular Full-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Di Fiore A; Graiff L; Savio G; Granata S; Basilicata M; Bollero P; Meneghello R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(8):. PubMed ID: 35457583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: An in vitro study.
    Pozzi A; Agliardi E; Lio F; Nagy K; Nardi A; Arcuri L
    J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):172-180. PubMed ID: 37574278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors.
    Revilla-León M; Kois DE; Kois JC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 36639916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maxillary Full-Arch Immediately Loaded Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis Designed and Produced by Photogrammetry and Digital Printing: A Clinical Report.
    Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Agustín-Panadero R; Pradíes G; Gomar-Vercher S; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 26662261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An
    Shaikh M; Lakha T; Kheur S; Qamri B; Kheur M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 36511075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.