174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38070591)
1. Long-Term Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-Derived Data.
Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Serna-Gallegos D; Makani A; Kliner D; Toma C; West D; Ahmad D; Yousef S; Brown JA; Yoon P; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J; Chu D; Sultan I
Am J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 212():30-39. PubMed ID: 38070591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus re-replacement: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.
Sá MP; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Hirji S; Erten O; Jacquemyn X; Tasoudis P; Dokollari A; Sicouri S; Weymann A; Ruhparwar A; Arora R; Clavel MA; Pibarot P; Ramlawi B
Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 370():112-121. PubMed ID: 36370873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Surgery for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Dysfunction.
Neupane S; Singh H; Lämmer J; Othman H; Yamasaki H; Rosman HS; Bossone E; Mehta RH; Eggebrecht H
Am J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 121(12):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29776652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jun; 67(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 30114716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nalluri N; Atti V; Munir AB; Karam B; Patel NJ; Kumar V; Vemula P; Edla S; Asti D; Paturu A; Gayam S; Spagnola J; Barsoum E; Maniatis GA; Tamburrino F; Kandov R; Lafferty J; Kliger C
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 31(5):661-671. PubMed ID: 29781182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-Analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo-surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve.
Al-Abcha A; Saleh Y; Boumegouas M; Prasad R; Herzallah K; Baloch ZQ; Abdelkarim O; Rayamajhi S; Abela GS
Am J Cardiol; 2021 May; 146():74-81. PubMed ID: 33529615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gozdek M; Raffa GM; Suwalski P; Kolodziejczak M; Anisimowicz L; Kubica J; Navarese EP; Kowalewski M;
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Mar; 53(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 29029105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early and Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration: Two Faces of the Same Medal.
Dokollari A; Cameli M; Mandoli GE; Kalra DS; Poston R; Coku L; Pernoci M; Miri M; Bonacchi M; Gelsomino S
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Nov; 35(11):3223-3231. PubMed ID: 34175205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed A; Levy KH
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus surgical redo aortic root replacement in patients with degenerated freestyle aortic bioprosthesis.
Vukadinovikj A; Baumgártner E; Bohmann K; Härter D; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Burgdorf C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 33522093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
Malik AH; Yandrapalli S; Zaid S; Shetty SS; Aronow WS; Ahmad H; Tang GHL
Am J Cardiol; 2020 May; 125(9):1378-1384. PubMed ID: 32139158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthesis.
Majmundar M; Doshi R; Kumar A; Johnston D; Brockett J; Kanaa'N A; Lahorra JA; Svensson LG; Krishnaswamy A; Reed GW; Puri R; Kapadia SR; Kalra A
EuroIntervention; 2022 Feb; 17(15):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 34521614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses.
Silaschi M; Wendler O; Seiffert M; Castro L; Lubos E; Schirmer J; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Schäfer U; Treede H; MacCarthy P; Conradi L
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27624351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Late Survival After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Balloon- Versus Self-Expandable Valves: Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.
Sá MP; Jacquemyn X; Simonato M; Brown JA; Ahmad D; Serna-Gallegos D; Clavel MA; Pibarot P; Dvir D; Sultan I
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 209():120-127. PubMed ID: 37875248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
