152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38071244)
1. vcfdist: accurately benchmarking phased small variant calls in human genomes.
Dunn T; Narayanasamy S
Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8149. PubMed ID: 38071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Best practices for benchmarking germline small-variant calls in human genomes.
Krusche P; Trigg L; Boutros PC; Mason CE; De La Vega FM; Moore BL; Gonzalez-Porta M; Eberle MA; Tezak Z; Lababidi S; Truty R; Asimenos G; Funke B; Fleharty M; Chapman BA; Salit M; Zook JM;
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 May; 37(5):555-560. PubMed ID: 30858580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking workflows to assess performance and suitability of germline variant calling pipelines in clinical diagnostic assays.
Krishnan V; Utiramerur S; Ng Z; Datta S; Snyder MP; Ashley EA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 33627090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SMaSH: a benchmarking toolkit for human genome variant calling.
Talwalkar A; Liptrap J; Newcomb J; Hartl C; Terhorst J; Curtis K; Bresler M; Song YS; Jordan MI; Patterson D
Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(19):2787-95. PubMed ID: 24894505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining accurate tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection.
Lee AY; Ewing AD; Ellrott K; Hu Y; Houlahan KE; Bare JC; Espiritu SMG; Huang V; Dang K; Chong Z; Caloian C; Yamaguchi TN; ; Kellen MR; Chen K; Norman TC; Friend SH; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; Haussler D; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
Genome Biol; 2018 Nov; 19(1):188. PubMed ID: 30400818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An open resource for accurately benchmarking small variant and reference calls.
Zook JM; McDaniel J; Olson ND; Wagner J; Parikh H; Heaton H; Irvine SA; Trigg L; Truty R; McLean CY; De La Vega FM; Xiao C; Sherry S; Salit M
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 May; 37(5):561-566. PubMed ID: 30936564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. geck: trio-based comparative benchmarking of variant calls.
Kómár P; Kural D
Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(20):3488-3495. PubMed ID: 29850774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longshot enables accurate variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing.
Edge P; Bansal V
Nat Commun; 2019 Oct; 10(1):4660. PubMed ID: 31604920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. iSVP: an integrated structural variant calling pipeline from high-throughput sequencing data.
Mimori T; Nariai N; Kojima K; Takahashi M; Ono A; Sato Y; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Nagasaki M
BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S8. PubMed ID: 24564972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehensive benchmarking and guidelines of mosaic variant calling strategies.
Ha YJ; Kang S; Kim J; Kim J; Jo SY; Kim S
Nat Methods; 2023 Dec; 20(12):2058-2067. PubMed ID: 37828153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Set-theory based benchmarking of three different variant callers for targeted sequencing.
Molina-Mora JA; Solano-Vargas M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):20. PubMed ID: 33413082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benchmarking and improving the performance of variant-calling pipelines with RecallME.
Vozza G; Bonetti E; Tini G; Favalli V; Frigè G; Bucci G; De Summa S; Zanfardino M; Zapelloni F; Mazzarella L
Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 39(12):. PubMed ID: 38092052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree.
Eberle MA; Fritzilas E; Krusche P; Källberg M; Moore BL; Bekritsky MA; Iqbal Z; Chuang HY; Humphray SJ; Halpern AL; Kruglyak S; Margulies EH; McVean G; Bentley DR
Genome Res; 2017 Jan; 27(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 27903644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calling known variants and identifying new variants while rapidly aligning sequence data.
VanRaden PM; Bickhart DM; O'Connell JR
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3216-3229. PubMed ID: 30772032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multilocus approach for accurate variant calling in low-copy repeats using whole-genome sequencing.
Prodanov T; Bansal V
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jun; 39(39 Suppl 1):i279-i287. PubMed ID: 37387146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast read alignment with incorporation of known genomic variants.
Guo H; Liu B; Guan D; Fu Y; Wang Y
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(Suppl 6):265. PubMed ID: 31856811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic diversity affects the accuracy of bacterial single-nucleotide polymorphism-calling pipelines.
Bush SJ; Foster D; Eyre DW; Clark EL; De Maio N; Shaw LP; Stoesser N; Peto TEA; Crook DW; Walker AS
Gigascience; 2020 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 32025702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. nPoRe: n-polymer realigner for improved pileup-based variant calling.
Dunn T; Blaauw D; Das R; Narayanasamy S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):98. PubMed ID: 36927439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
