These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Redo-TAVR Feasibility After SAPIEN 3 Stratified by Implant Depth and Commissural Alignment: A CT Simulation Study. Koshy AN; Tang GHL; Khera S; Vinayak M; Berdan M; Gudibendi S; Hooda A; Safi L; Lerakis S; Dangas GD; Sharma SK; Kini AS; Krishnamoorthy P Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Mar; 17(3):e013766. PubMed ID: 38502723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve. Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk. Søndergaard L; Ihlemann N; Capodanno D; Jørgensen TH; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Chang Y; Steinbrüchel DA; Olsen PS; Petronio AS; Thyregod HGH J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 73(5):546-553. PubMed ID: 30732707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves. Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic Outcome and Valve Durability Beyond Five Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Murray MI; Hofmann E; De Rosa R; Mas-Peiro S; Seppelt P; Walther T; Zeiher AM; Fichtlscherer S; Vasa-Nicotera M J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 32(3):82-87. PubMed ID: 32123140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction. Landes U; Webb JG; De Backer O; Sondergaard L; Abdel-Wahab M; Crusius L; Kim WK; Hamm C; Buzzatti N; Montorfano M; Ludwig S; Schofer N; Voigtlaender L; Guerrero M; El Sabbagh A; Rodés-Cabau J; Guimaraes L; Kornowski R; Codner P; Okuno T; Pilgrim T; Fiorina C; Colombo A; Mangieri A; Eltchaninoff H; Nombela-Franco L; Van Wiechen MPH; Van Mieghem NM; Tchétché D; Schoels WH; Kullmer M; Tamburino C; Sinning JM; Al-Kassou B; Perlman GY; Danenberg H; Ielasi A; Fraccaro C; Tarantini G; De Marco F; Witberg G; Redwood SR; Lisko JC; Babaliaros VC; Laine M; Nerla R; Castriota F; Finkelstein A; Loewenstein I; Eitan A; Jaffe R; Ruile P; Neumann FJ; Piazza N; Alosaimi H; Sievert H; Sievert K; Russo M; Andreas M; Bunc M; Latib A; Govdfrey R; Hildick-Smith D; Sathananthan J; Hensey M; Alkhodair A; Blanke P; Leipsic J; Wood DA; Nazif TM; Kodali S; Leon MB; Barbanti M J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Apr; 75(16):1882-1893. PubMed ID: 32327098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]